Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #106168
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-05-03 14:54 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzn0xqfwjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <ktgpfctno06u90o20pjthakf899952kmtg@4ax.com> <D5222DCF.A0EF9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <n6upfct27u73nh3k2a9mj7akc1pcn6p0oh@4ax.com> <D5224BC7.A0FA0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <k33qfc90qvn9rasdfdnnf05ei3omn5ih6c@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:28:18 +0100, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:17:11 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/23/17, 12:00 PM, in article n6upfct27u73nh3k2a9mj7akc1pcn6p0oh@4ax.com, >> "Ken Blake" <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> I would have said "that should be 'everyone should think for >>>>>>> himself.' " <vbg> >>>>>> >>>>>> I might not have his wording exact (this was in, I think, 1998)... >>>>> >>>>> I know. I suspected that. <g> >>>> >>>> Actually 1988. Not 1998. Only a decade off. :) >>>> >>>>>> and, >>>>>> really, "themselves" has been used that way for generations. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I know that too. And there are those who argue that that's the >>>>> way it should be. But to an old fuddy-duddy like me, it's simply >>>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> It took me a while to accept it, but I still cringe when I hear people >>>> pronounce the "t" in "often". Used to be that was considered a no-no... but >>>> it is done so often it is now accepted. >>> >>> Accepted by some people, but not by me. To me, it's another example of >>> "simply wrong." >> >> As I said I still cringe but I have learned to accept it as "correct" these >> days. >> >>>> Same with only one space after a >>>> period, I was taught two and had to adjust. >>> >>> But I disagree with you on that. Back in the days of typewriters, what >>> you say was correct. Even today, with a monospaced font, it's better >>> to have two spaces; it makes it easier to read. But it's never been >>> correct with proportional fonts. >> >> Right... but monospaced used to be the norm. > > > Yep. As I said "back in the days of typewriters..." Monospaced was > the only choice. > > >> Now it is the exception. When I >> was taught I was never told of the difference being based on the font, just >> that two spaces was the "rule." > > > > Yes, because you were probably taught in the age of typewriters, and > there were no other choices but monospaced then. > > Even today, there are still many people using proportional fonts on > computers and putting in two spaces because that's the way they were > taught. I do it because it's neater, in any font. I was never taught to do it. -- It's not the dress that makes your bum look big honey, it's the 30 cakes you ate yesterday.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:54 +0100
csiph-web