Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #662

Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac

Show all headers | View raw

Le 2011-04-13 00:29, Doug Anderson a écrit :
> Priam<priam@nowhere.com>  writes:
>
>> Le 2011-04-12 20:25, David Empson a écrit :
>>> Priam<priam@nowhere.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 2011-04-09 18:13, David Empson a écrit :
>>>>> Howard S Shubs<howard@shubs.net>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article<909grsFvqkU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>>>     Jeffrey Goldberg<nobody@goldmark.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as we know there is no technological enforcement of the 5
>>>>>>> installations. And there is certainly no restriction on reinstalling
>>>>>>> after reformatting or replacing a disk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.  The difference in the Family Pack is a different license, as far
>>>>>> as I can tell.  The license allows five installations at a time instead
>>>>>> of one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Five installations in a single household.
>>>>
>>>> But what's a household?
>>>
>>> Why do you care? You aren't running Mac OS X anyway.
>>>
>>> Here is the relevant section of the 10.6 licence agreement.
>>>
>>> "B. Family Pack License. If you have purchased a Family Pack license,
>>> then subject to the terms and conditions of this License, you are
>>> granted a limited non-exclusive license to install, use and run one (1)
>>> copy of the Apple Software on up to a maximum of five (5) Apple-branded
>>> computers at a time as long as those computers are located in the same
>>> household and used by persons who occupy that same household. By
>>> "household" we mean a person or persons who share the same housing unit
>>> such as a home, apartment, mobile home or condominium, but shall also
>>> extend to student members who are primary residents of that household
>>> but residing at a separate on-campus location. The Family Pack License
>>> does not extend to business or commercial users. "
>>
>> Here's the GNU/GPL2 license: If you change the code and provide
>> executables, you must provide the code.
>
> You apparently haven't read it.  It is several pages long.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html

And what does this legalese boils down to that I haven't said?

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Snow Leopard 5 pac pf@porkain'tkosher.oink (Paul Fuchs) - 2011-04-08 15:19 -0700
  Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2011-04-08 17:34 -0500
    Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2011-04-09 11:36 -0600
      Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2011-04-10 10:13 +1200
        Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Priam <priam@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-12 13:22 -0400
          Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 16:44 -0400
            Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Priam <priam@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-13 00:39 -0400
          Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2011-04-13 12:25 +1200
            Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Priam <priam@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-12 22:50 -0400
              Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 21:29 -0700
                Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Priam <priam@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-13 00:34 -0400
                Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2011-04-13 21:37 -0400
              Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 08:44 -0400
          Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-13 12:11 -0500
          Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 10:52 +0000
  Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2011-04-08 18:49 -0400
    Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2011-04-08 16:41 -0700
      Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2011-04-08 20:13 -0400
  Re: Snow Leopard 5 pac Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 06:53 +0000

csiph-web