Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs
Date	20 Oct 2016 20:11:14 GMT
Organization	People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines	20
Message-ID	<e6smn2FpjkiU7@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<nub7nt$5sj$3@dont-email.me>
X-Trace	individual.net ORe9zGCqMRzBnCMF6Am17QLglKQ1vf8nwgJBogD0vD58p1sTiG
Cancel-Lock	sha1:5oFO4KrQQKxSIK7rUkhTbnU0hws=
Mail-Copies-To	nobody
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref	csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:95863

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2016-10-20, Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2016 16:42:55 GMT
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> Needless to say, the employees at IBM got it right. And with 73% of
>> them saying they want their next computer to be a Mac, the success
>> will only increase with time.
>
> seems the linux users at ibm of which there are a lot are letting

Nope. It doesn't seem like that at all. And employees who use other
platforms, including Linux, likely have no say in the matter of who gets
to use which platform. Nice try, but fail. Guess you'll have to troll
harder.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than  PCs Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2016-10-20 12:58 -0700
  Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than  PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 20:11 +0000
  Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2016-10-20 16:13 -0400
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 20:14 +0000
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2016-10-20 16:18 -0400
        Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 20:28 +0000
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2016-10-20 16:39 -0400
        Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs cb <cb@aol.com> - 2016-10-22 03:59 +0200
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2016-10-21 22:07 -0400
            Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs cb <cb@aol.com> - 2016-10-22 04:14 +0200
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2016-10-21 22:10 -0400
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-21 08:58 +0000
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-21 20:34 -0500
        Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-22 01:45 +0000
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-22 17:15 -0500

csiph-web