Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #100069
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 07:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d9689dd4-fa53-489f-a845-861b59e5cab0@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Sandman <jonaseklundhsandman@gmail.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D4C0C38D.8F1D8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > > > Snit: > > > > > This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every > > > > > page: > > > > > > > > Sandman: > > > > ..of the HTML presented by the WayBackMachine, not > > > > the HTML as it was on my homepage > > > > > > > *ELEVEN YEARS AGO*. > > > > > > > Here is a link to the *CSS* validating for my page on one of > > > > the dates you have used as "support" (which of course is *NOT* > > > > the date your claim is relevant to); > > > > > > > That's for the date 2006-05-19, your claim was made on > > > > 2006-05-31 > > > > > Snit was unable to counter this, so he ignored it, like he always > > does - he can't support his claims so he runs and hides. > > I showed EVERY date in the WBM (up to that point ..of validation of the WBM *HTML*, not as my page was when you made the claim, and NOT from the date you made the claim, making your "support" anything but. What you snipped and ran from: > What was noted is you have more than one CSS file tied > to that page and you looked at only one. Lie #1 Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page: <http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/> In the HTML, there is *one* (1) link to an external CSS files: <link href="/web/20060519191417cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/include/styles_plai n.php" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="iso-8859-1"> That's it - that's my CSS file. At the time, I used many CSS files that were all aggregated into one output from one PHP script, which is that link. And the output of that link at the time was this: <http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php> WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator: <https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all &warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en> It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence. > You also validated against a different standard than was the > accepted one at the time. This was in 2006, CSS3 is from *1999*. Get with the program already. Just looking at the CSS would show you that it is shock-full of CSS3 So here we have it - you have tried to use WBM to show that my CSS doesn't validate, when in fact WBM shows that it validates perfectly. Color me shocked! And it doesn't even have data for the date you made your lie! Now run along, this is way out of your league - and has been for the last eleven years. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYnA42AAoJECFEwfBaA+jR+ysH/2Bhkji1WdLp+89EwHtmUEoZ 7Afs+EhhwHToSi/ZA+6Yn3xwf9JcFMPTWHufjvtM1Brl/J2+WrpdK2ygXk+IAiLr AYjozAGj8aP1VEfZxKwx9OgOf0BGA30yCzvav8ZO1dJvOin85TNXSSXSwGApNqui iscTm7m5BjYtOk1eGb4BzTtuiuNfvUBhEqBww8PUORhy39TViCN/n+8OYQuBX/LS W2XOtUy22iApRwSOHus49jczvr3tHm6Fnq0vzns9v0CjyTc9F4tSILrz7aglrsPc 7MwBhNKr2dViK0498wQ5bCQVTY6sBGknlj3ex7A3DPHZODhC3d6Sd83Y1VmhbgI= =GHfv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sandman
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS Sandman <jonaseklundhsandman@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 07:24 -0800 Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-09 08:43 -0700
csiph-web