Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #88234
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| References | <728ad0fc-4521-4785-aec5-ef205d23ef33@googlegroups.com> <ed3305582ef1759b6f18befdd10e839f@remailer.org.uk> <slrnnapqta.gvh.admin@fleegle.mixmin.net> <cc7409e2bd67c7b03f55ff88409257d5@anemone.mooo.com> |
| Subject | Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? |
| Message-ID | <d81e1aa7ee747ff31f0775dacd34685f@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-01-30 23:38 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <cc7409e2bd67c7b03f55ff88409257d5@anemone.mooo.com> Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> wrote: > > Zax <admin@mixmin.net> wrote: > > >On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:35:27 +0000 (GMT), Nathan Hale wrote in > >Message-Id: <ed3305582ef1759b6f18befdd10e839f@remailer.org.uk>: > > > >> Something that entails a much greater problem is intels possibly > >> breaking into remailer servers and confiscating the remailer keys. > >> Zax's is probably the only remailer that has some kind of key > >> encryption onboard his servers. Wish there was some kind of info on > >> how to implement this. Other than that, you would probably need to > >> completely lock down you Linux, allowing only remailers in. > > > >I put my remailer keys on an encrypted disc which is mounted with a > >random key. Reboot the server and the keys are lost. Gaining access to > >the Linux filesystem is easy if the server is rebooted into single-user > >mode. Any encrypted filesystem protects against that issue but the > >random key makes it pretty obvious that coercion isn't going to help > >get them back. > > Taking over a computer doesn't necessarily require it to be rebooted. True. I take over mac computers all the time when I have the need to engage in nefarious misdeeds. I specifically target macs because there is a security hole that has existed for two decades, thru every new revision of OS, and it has never been fixed.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-01-30 23:38 +0100
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-30 23:29 +0000
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 23:27 -0500
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-31 04:42 +0000
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 07:23 -0500
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-02-01 03:12 +0100
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 23:05 -0500
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-02-01 17:16 +0000
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-06 19:04 +1300
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201602.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-02-02 01:44 +0100
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-02-01 17:23 -0800
Re: Network Pinger Stats.... Inadequate Management & Omissions...??? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 20:26 -0500
csiph-web