Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #83825

Re: Webkit Snit Circus

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.freeware, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Webkit Snit Circus
Date 2015-10-19 13:01 -0700
Message-ID <D24A9A34.60A9D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (20 earlier) <56242f5a$0$4539$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> <n01ir7$dsi$1@news.albasani.net> <n02n9q$hor$1@dont-email.me> <D24A7816.60A23%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <n03h32$vlv$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/19/15, 12:44 PM, in article n03h32$vlv$1@dont-email.me, "A.M"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2015-10-19 1:36 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 10/19/15, 5:24 AM, in article n02n9q$hor$1@dont-email.me, "A.M"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> and nobody contrbutes to the
>>>>> original source anymore since the original company is not allowed to
>>>>> manage it ?
>>>> 
>>>> Anybody who modifies the code is contributing to the original, as they
>>>> must make the source code available for all of their modifications, if
>>>> they distribute their work.
>>> 
>>> Good post, Nobody. I have to admit that I am a big fan of the GPL and
>>> have been inspired to use a similar license for the book I've already
>>> released and for any subsequent work I produce. In a world where big
>>> pharmaceutical companies can buy smaller ones for the sole purpose of
>>> radically increasing the prices on the medication people rely on to
>>> live, it's clear that while capitalism is the best system, people need
>>> to learn to share and stop only thinking about the bottom dollar.
>> 
>> I use a license similar to the GPL but without all the philosophical
>> nonsense tossed in. Same basic protections without the lies!
> 
> Lies seem to be a recurring theme in everything related to Linux.

Pretty much... but the Simple Public License offers similar IP protections
to the GPL 2.0 WITHOUT the nonsense wording and philosophical BS in the GPL
preamble: 

    <http://opensource.org/licenses/Simple-2.0>

To each their own, but I would NEVER publish my own work under the GPL
unless I had to (if it was based on other work with its IP protected by the
GPL).

Since the terms are pretty much the same, I wonder if it would be legal to
license GPL protected code under the Simple License? I doubt it... but am
not a lawyer. It does say the TERMS have to be the same, which they would be
legally, but you would get around that idiotic preamble. I would certainly
check with a lawyer before I ever did that if the need came up.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Webkit Snit Circus Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 16:12 -0500
  Re: Webkit Snit Circus Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-18 23:22 +0200
    Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 14:28 -0700
    Re: Webkit Snit Circus Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 17:59 -0400
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 17:38 -0500
        Re: Webkit Snit Circus Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 11:22 -0400
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-19 12:17 -0400
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 10:54 -0700
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-19 00:39 +0200
        Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 16:32 -0700
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 15:08 -0700
    Re: Webkit Snit Circus JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-18 18:09 -0400
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-19 00:36 +0200
        Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 15:53 -0700
        Re: Webkit Snit Circus GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-18 17:14 -0600
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 16:30 -0700
            Re: Webkit Snit Circus GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-19 19:43 -0600
              Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 19:04 -0700
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 17:37 -0500
        Re: Webkit Snit Circus JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-18 19:46 -0400
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 16:53 -0700
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 20:48 -0500
          Re: Webkit Snit Circus Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-18 21:00 -0500
            Re: Webkit Snit Circus "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-19 08:24 -0400
              Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 10:36 -0700
                Re: Webkit Snit Circus "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-19 15:44 -0400
                Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-19 13:01 -0700
      Re: Webkit Snit Circus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-18 15:55 -0700

csiph-web