Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #676
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.brown.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin |
| References | <2011040817194216807-spammersgohere@spaminvalid> |
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
| Organization | Rare |
| Date | 13 Apr 2011 08:47:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <93lizeup98.fsf@ethel.the.log> (permalink) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| User-Agent | Emacs Gnus |
| Lines | 27 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 13 Apr 2011 10:47:47 CDT |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@octanews.net |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.system:676 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Geico Caveman <spammers-go-here@spam.invalid> writes: > I have a few programs available over an NFS mount that are targetted > at the Linux AMD64 architecture. They use Xorg/X11, which is available > on my Mac (Xquartz). > > I am running Snow Leopard on an Intel 64-bit machine. I am certain > that if I ran Linux on the same hardware, I would be able to run those > programs (there are linux distributions available which can transform > a mac into a linux machine - they have been around since the PPC days). > > So, far, I have been getting by with a virtual machine running lubuntu > and running it via VMware. > > My question is - is there a binary translator of some sort that will > allow me to run these programs on the mac "natively" ? As far as I know, the answer is no, as it usually is to running executables made for one operating system on a different operating system. (The virtual machine solution which you are already using is as close to "yes" as one usually gets.) The fact that both linux and OS X are layers on top of unix variants, and the fact that they both run X windows means that you might be able to recompile your software on OS X, if you have the source code. But your linux executables won't work without a virtual machine.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Geico Caveman <spammers-go-here@spam.invalid> - 2011-04-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2011-04-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Geico Caveman <spammers-go-here@spam.invalid> - 2011-04-08 18:51 -0500
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2011-04-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2011-04-08 21:40 -0700
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Paul Sture <paul.nospam@sture.ch> - 2011-04-10 12:22 +0200
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2011-04-09 03:43 -0400
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Marko Vihoma <marko.vihoma@whereever.invalid> - 2011-04-13 09:58 +0300
Re: Running binaries for other architectures on Darwin Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 08:47 -0700
csiph-web