Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #104723
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Date | 2017-04-20 07:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2017042007264578209-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> (permalink) |
| References | (20 earlier) <op.yyq2iog9js98qf@red.lan> <2017041513490814915-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyq8enxtjs98qf@red.lan> <2017041514554840413-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyzwxp0zjs98qf@red.lan> |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 2017-04-20 13:26:03 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> said: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:55:48 +0100, wrote: > >> On 2017-04-15 20:55:25 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" >> <imvalid@somewear.com> said: >> >>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:49:08 +0100, wrote: >>>> On 2017-04-15 18:48:14 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" >>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> said: >>>>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:41:19 +0100, wrote: >>>>>> On 2017-04-12 03:44:10 +0000, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> said: >>>>>>> On 04/11/2017 04:43 PM, Savageduck wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For many good photo printers you will usually find 6 or more inks. My >>>>>>>> Epson uses 8 UltraChrome K3 inks; Photo Black, Light Black, Light Light >>>>>>>> Black, Yellow, Vivid Magenta, Vivid Light Magenta, Cyan, Light Cyan, and >>>>>>>> when using matte paper Photo Black is exchanged for Matte Black. The >>>>>>>> newer photo printers user 10 tanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is light black like dark white? >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps the "Light Light Black" would be closer to that description, >>>>>> but I have never made a print isolated to that ink, so who knows. I >>>>>> have never thought of it as a "dark white". However, printing a >>>>>> graduated grey scale using the three blacks; Black, Light Black, and >>>>>> Light Light Black produces a smoother grad, and gives better shadow to >>>>>> light transitions, especially with toning in B&W prints. >>>>>> >>>>>> That idea can be seen in this shot: >>>>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/c79h3ryxhxp2tu9/DSC_3427-Edit-2.jpg> >>>>> >>>>> I just printed that on photo paper at max quality (it took 5 minutes) >>>>> with 4 inks. It looks perfect (well as good as the image on the >>>>> screen). Either it's jpeg compressed too much, or I can see artefacts >>>>> from your CCD. If you look for example in the top left corner, you can >>>>> clearly see where the shades of grey change. If you zoom in, it looks >>>>> like JPEG artefacts (blockyness). >>>> >>>> You might have noted that image is a resized, 666KB 1476 x 980 JPEG >>>> intended for the purpose of illustrating a gradient on screen, not for >>>> the production of a print. >>> >>> It doesn't illustrate it very well, as it's low quality. >>> >>>> So whatever you printed was hardly at "max >>>> quality" regardless of the number of inks used, >>> >>> It certainly was, the printer was set to the highest setting of 5. >>> >>>> or the time it took >>>> your printer to grind out a print. I would never use that particular >>>> file for printing, and I was not about to post a link to a 73MB 4288 x >>>> 2848 PSD which is what I have printed from. >>> >>> So why not link to something that's a decent test? I've got broadband >>> you know, I can download a large image.... >> >> Think about it. Why would anybody care to share a full quality image >> file with a stranger. > > To make your point. > >> I have no problem posting image files for >> illustrative or demo, but those are going to be resized and somewhat >> compressed. > > Why? Think about it, perhaps the answer will come to you. -- Regards, Savageduck
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 19:48 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 13:49 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 21:55 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:03 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 22:47 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:31 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 14:55 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-20 14:26 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-20 07:26 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-20 15:31 +0100
csiph-web