Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive?

From	nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive?
Date	2015-09-01 22:41 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<010920152241015192%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink)
References	(17 earlier) <55d4cb64$0$41694$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> <2015081912090962410-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015090112335415869-tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> <2015090118295847939-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015090119314748632-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <2015090119314748632-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> >> (I viewed a video demo of adjustment layers and Smart Objects and 
> >> concluded that using those features wouldn't significantly (or at all) 
> >> reduce my steps, because they can't replace the above-mentioned steps 
> >> I'm doing.)
> > 
> > Because you have locked yourself into an inefficient workflow, and 
> > refuse to accpt that there is a better way to reach your goal.
> > 
> > You are never going to improve the performance of Photoshop by adding 
> > RAM, if you stick to your methodology.
> 
> BTW: Why don't you share one of your images with us, so we can see what 
> it is you have achieved?

a before and after would be helpful, with a brief description of what
was done.

> You might also consider exploring alt.photography, or 
> rec.photo.digital. There you will find a completely different group of 
> folks who can't agree with one another.

some of whom will tell him that that since what he's doing works for
him, others should not interfere to tell him about a better way. that's
not helpful.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-09-01 12:33 -0700
  Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-01 15:50 -0400
  Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-01 18:29 -0700
    Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-01 19:31 -0700
      Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:41 -0400

csiph-web