Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.mac.misc > #9357
| From | Tyrone <none@none.none> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? |
| References | <10fgkpm$19b8r$1@dont-email.me> <hcGdncqEf5dDZob0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com> <10fh0ep$1borq$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <rh6dnXjduea0boH0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2025-11-18 22:28 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Nov 18, 2025 at 12:33:13 AM EST, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > On 2025-11-18 04:53:50 +0000, Tyrone said: >> On Nov 17, 2025 at 9:14:15 PM EST, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>> >>> In the age of Apple Silicon the Mac Pro has been become a pretty >>> pointless device thanks to having almost nothing that is upgradable - >>> all you can really do is add more internal drives (which, considering >>> Apple's rather stingy and high-priced built-in drives, was its only >>> plus point). The number of people who need a PCI / similar slot for >>> anything else is pretty miniscule these days. >> >> Makes sense. The big ugly tower with roaring fans and "slots" is a relic of >> the Intel/Motorola/Power PC stone age. The huge motherboard with RAM here and >> CPU over there and "slots" way over there is so 30 years ago. >> >> Everything integrated on a single chip is the present and the future. It is >> faster, uses WAY less power, generates WAY less heat and fits into a MUCH >> smaller case that MIGHT need a single, whisper-quiet, low-speed fan. >> >> Plus, no other consumer product is "upgradeable". TVs, microwave ovens, >> refrigerators, cars, furniture, phones, watches, speakers, headphones etc. >> You buy what you need now and can afford now. >> >> You want/need more later? Buy a new, bigger one and sell the old one. > > Unfortunately that is the stupidity of today's selfish "throw away" > society. In the long run it makes no real sense because it is more > wasteful, more expensive, and uses up far more resources. :-(\ I did not say "throw it away". I said sell it on eBay to help defray the cost of the new one. Also, a single chip is WAY less wasteful than hundreds of separate chips on multiple huge boards. Those boards were each the size of a 14" screen today. Could be even larger. Talk about waste.
Back to comp.sys.mac.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-11-18 15:14 +1300
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-11-18 04:53 +0000
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-11-18 18:33 +1300
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-11-18 22:28 +0000
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-11-19 16:20 +1300
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-11-19 11:26 +0100
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-11-19 15:47 +0000
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-11-20 10:34 +1300
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-12-02 04:14 +0000
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-12-02 18:14 +1300
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-11-19 11:21 +0100
Re: [RUMOUR] R.I.P. Mac Pro ?? Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2025-12-13 12:09 -0500
csiph-web