Re: Android 'poised to fail' vs. iPads

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject	Re: Android 'poised to fail' vs. iPads
Date	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:07:47 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	7
Message-ID	<imcka2$v08$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<ilnhvi$f4q$1@news.eternal-september.org> <imck30$uig$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host	GmePkHVD4vqtpumyxM2owA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.misc:106

Show key headers only | View raw

On 23/03/11 11:04, Calum wrote:

> <http://blogs.computerworld.com/18014/ipad_2_beaten_by_samsung_galaxy_tab_10_1_8_9_cita?uc>

Sorry, here's a better link about the Galaxy Tabs that doesn't require 
any subscription: 
<http://www.pcworld.com/article/222808/samsung_announces_worlds_thinnest_tablets_galaxy_tab_89_and_101.html>

Back to comp.sys.mac.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Android 'poised to fail' vs. iPads Jim_Higgins <gordian238@hotmail.com> - 2011-03-15 19:19 +0800
  Re: Android 'poised to fail' vs. iPads Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2011-03-23 11:04 +0000
    Re: Android 'poised to fail' vs. iPads Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2011-03-23 11:07 +0000

csiph-web