Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.misc > #5634
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.misc |
| Subject | Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More |
| Date | 2016-11-17 09:05 +1300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <171120160905542929%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink) |
| References | <o0f6rc$81a$1@dont-email.me> <161120160911213364%YourName@YourISP.com> <o0hjog$d1n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
In article <o0hjog$d1n$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> wrote: > On 15/11/2016 20:11, Your Name wrote: > > > > Phil Schiller also seems to be an idiot. He claims Apple doesn't want > > to make a touchscreen laptop because it would cause a usage division > > between the laptop and desktop lines (due to a touchscreen iMac being > > too cumbersome to use, so one would be touchscreen and the other not) > > ... as if the silly Touch Bar gimmick hasn't already created that > > "usage division". > > Not really, at least not any more than 3D/Force/Whatever-it's-called- > this-week Touch. Anything you can do on the touch bar, you can do some > other way without it... and that will have to be the case for at least > as long as you can buy a new desktop or laptop Mac from Apple that > doesn't have one. But the same thing could be said for a touchscreen laptop (you can still use the mouse / trackpad to do the same things), which Schiller says touchscreen won't be done since it would create a "usage divide" between the laptop and desktop Mac computers. Of course, like many many other things, Apple will change it's mind at some stage and then claim it as being the best thing since than sliced bread. :-\ Having said that, personally I don't want a touchscreen Mac. A fat finger will never, ever be as accurate as a mouse and even using a stylus is an awful experience because your hand is always blocking part of the screen ... you'll get a pile of people asking questions and when give then answer they'll say, "I didn't see that hidden by my hand".
Back to comp.sys.mac.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Apple, a Trendsetter No More Jim_Higgins <gordian240@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:42 -0500
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-11-16 09:11 +1300
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2016-11-16 12:34 +0000
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Jim_Higgins <gordian240@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:41 -0500
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-11-16 14:29 +0000
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More android <here@there.was> - 2016-11-16 15:41 +0100
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-11-17 09:09 +1300
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-11-16 21:11 +0000
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-16 11:00 -0500
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-16 11:00 -0500
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-11-17 09:05 +1300
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-11-16 15:55 +0000
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More isquat@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 02:35 -0800
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-11-29 09:15 +1300
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-11-16 09:17 +1300
Re: Apple, a Trendsetter No More Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-11-16 14:05 +0000
csiph-web