Groups > comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc > #126

Re: larger monitor for mac mini

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Mike Dee <mikedee@emteedee.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc
Subject	Re: larger monitor for mac mini
Date	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	Poor Boy
Lines	28
Message-ID	<Xns9F1CDCD45D23Bemteedee@46.4.82.166> (permalink)
References	<replytome-BF88E0.16240512062011@news.eternal-september.org> <1k2stmh.isoq6qre91hwN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <replytome-757FAB.09015513062011@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	solani.org 1310125329 19577 eJwNxIkNwEAIA7CZCiTAOnz7j9CTJUP5sd0IGu6Zrazmm9EjzuwtkYmxPY2QVATC84jO+QEy+xFp (8 Jul 2011 11:42:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	Xnews/2009.05.01
X-User-ID	eJwNyMEBwCAIA8CVRAKUcZDI/iPYe56pi3fAzWFjMxNx5ENCu5OTsSoXeKklV2p8s7GL5Ok/HyvCElE=
X-Face	$W<X:Uw4$"nTXRHqqZ=.\|pFI@K,TNNH0i>-J;N5/yst7]cQb.o^L$oAhs-J!C AOUMQ^NHu3aTb9H8awW~4Y.LR`[o}Rz6Xf=^krb-AwUiM"7zA+QR<vWz'8>hKiTOyd]h z]7m=[nhuH{NMrE>~][PM`wSKd?TFV-.glh)>N
Cancel-Lock	sha1:bhF0EyS3tqTUlEg8CrdJqmgBTlY=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwNy8EBwCAIA8CVpCRAxqki+4/Q3v/oYXESwQCHc/qGGoteqLtzVJAX530I5cI2U9dfFDfbPhILEG8=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc:126

Show key headers only | View raw

Suze wrote:

>  dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote:

>> Need more information: what resolution is your 22" display
>> running at, and what resolution do you think you would like to
>> run at given a larger display?
> 
> I do have the 2.26 GHz late 2009 Mini. I am running this Acer
> X223w 22-in wide monitor at 1440x900 resolution. Cost IS a
> consideration for me. I work mostly textƒ "some of the text is
> from OLD medical records which were copied, and the quality
> sometimes is pretty sucky. Sometimes they are small print too and
> I have to enlarge them to make them readable.

You should be able to get 1680 x 1050 native resolution from your 
current monitor (according to my Google search on this display). Not 
a vast improvement, but better than what your present resolution is 
set to.

We have the same model Mac Mini and have an NEC 2490WUXi with a 
display res of 1920x1200 attached. This I think is the maximum 
supported display res for this Mac model but it really is very nice. 
This NEC was expensive, there are cheaper monitors with a 1920x1200 
display.

-- 
dee

Back to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

larger monitor for mac mini Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> - 2011-06-12 16:24 -0500
  Re: larger monitor for mac mini Bob Harris <nospam.News.Bob@remove.Smith-Harris.us> - 2011-06-12 19:38 -0400
  Re: larger monitor for mac mini dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2011-06-13 12:22 +1200
    Re: larger monitor for mac mini Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> - 2011-06-13 09:01 -0500
      Re: larger monitor for mac mini Mike Dee <mikedee@emteedee.invalid> - 2011-07-08 11:42 +0000
        Re: larger monitor for mac mini Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> - 2011-07-08 10:34 -0500
          Re: larger monitor for mac mini Mike Dee <mikedee@emteedee.invalid> - 2011-07-09 03:58 +0000
  Re: larger monitor for mac mini Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-12 20:04 -0700

csiph-web