Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.intel > #527

Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.intel, comp.os.vms, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre?
Date 29 Jan 2018 18:31:02 -0500
Organization Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines 14
Message-ID <p4oarm$k2i$1@panix2.panix.com> (permalink)
References <e66713528ffe8ca0a8b2e79e2133037d@dizum.com> <973f7f34a3fab7ad4f0e584e782eb6a6@dizum.com> <p4o4po$cbn$2@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host panix2.panix.com
X-Trace reader2.panix.com 1517268662 19380 166.84.1.2 (29 Jan 2018 23:31:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 29 Jan 2018 23:31:02 +0000 (UTC)
Xref csiph.com alt.privacy.anon-server:63841 comp.sys.intel:527 comp.os.vms:74051 comp.os.linux.advocacy:444734

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Meltdown is the result of an error made by Intel.  Some Intel processors are
susceptable to it.  It is not that difficult to work around in the Unix world,
but it is fairly easy to exploit if that has not been done.

Spectre is a more fundamental exploit, and it's likely the first of a whole
new class of timing-related exploits.  It's difficult to take advantage of
compared with Meltdown.  However, any processor with a sufficiently precise
timer and low-jitter system clock that uses branch prediction is vulnerable.
Which means just about everything post-vax, pretty much.  This is a far more
alarming thing, not really even related to Meltdown.
--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-01-29 21:20 +0100
  Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? DaveFroble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2018-01-29 16:47 -0500
    Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? Helmut <pills@carters.com> - 2018-01-29 22:44 +0000
    Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2018-01-29 18:08 -0500
      Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-01-30 13:40 +0100
    Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2018-01-29 18:31 -0500
    Re: What Linux architectures are not susceptible to meltdown or spectre? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-01-30 00:26 +0100

csiph-web