Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.intel > #125
| From | "Jim" <jim@wtf.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.intel |
| References | <4e8070ff$1@x-privat.org> |
| Subject | Re: QX9770+X48 versus Nehalem? |
| Date | 2011-09-28 09:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <icWdnS5httd9vh7TnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Theoretically 1600MHZ FSB=12.8GB/s Nehalem's tri channel DDR3 1066=25.584GB/s Bloomfield's dual channel DDR3 1333=21.328GB/s Some real world numbers. Nehalem v Core2 Extreme http://techreport.com/articles.x/15818/5 And Bloomfield v C2Q http://techreport.com/articles.x/17545/5
Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
QX9770+X48 versus Nehalem? "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-09-26 14:33 +0100 Re: QX9770+X48 versus Nehalem? "Jim" <jim@wtf.invalid> - 2011-09-28 09:40 -0400
csiph-web