Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #6813
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" |
| Date | 2016-02-18 13:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <diknh0FpsmfU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <na00ot$i66$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA5B0D6E03DC5CD4AM2@216.151.153.41> <dijjqhFgu87U1@mid.individual.net> |
"Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> wrote in message news:dijjqhFgu87U1@mid.individual.net... > On 02/16/2016 04:07 PM, pamela wrote: > >>> "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" >>> https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-q4-2015 >>> / >>> >>> "By the end of 2015, the Backblaze datacenter had 56,224 >>> spinning hard drives containing customer data. These hard drives >>> reside in 1,249 Backblaze Storage Pods. By comparison 2015 began >>> with 39,690 drives running in 882 Storage Pods. We added 65 >>> Petabytes of storage in 2015 give or take a Petabyte or two. Not >>> only was 2015 a year of growth, it was also a year of drive >>> upgrades and replacements." >>> >>> Uh oh, the WDC 2 TB and 3 TB drive failure rate is climbing. >>> And the WDC 6 TB is scary also. > >> Wasn't Seagate doing badly not long ago at Backblaze? > > Now that I have looked at Backblaze's report, I see that the 3TB Seagates > that they have now quit using were *really* bad: 23.86% failure rate; and > some others were not good either. > > It's interesting that the HGST figures are significantly better than the > WDC figures, even though HGST is now owned by WDC. > > It's also interesting that the 6TB Seagates they are using at present are > the ST6000DX001, which are what I found in "retail" STBD6000100 packages, > whereas the only "bare" Seagate 6TB Desktop drives are ST6000DM001.* Is > there a material difference between them? (In many other capacities the > STn00DXnnn drives are SSHD models, but there is no indication that the 6TB > ones are SSHD -- just "spinning rust.") > > *I have seen comments on Amazon from people who bought "bare" ST6000DX001 > drives and then found that the Seagate warranty check indicates that they > were originally sold as component parts of some other unit -- presumably > an external drive that has been sold without its case and USB adapter. Why > are external drives (with case and USB adapter) often cheaper than the > same ones sold as "internal"? Presumably because they are sold in rather higher volume by operations like Amazon.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
"Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-02-16 14:31 -0600
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" pamela <invalid@nospam.com> - 2016-02-16 21:07 +0000
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 21:52 +0800
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2016-02-17 17:48 -0800
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 19:27 +0800
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2016-02-26 13:04 -0800
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 13:05 +1100
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" Sam <newsgroup2003@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 19:53 -0700
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:53 +1100
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> - 2016-02-17 10:10 -0500
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 13:08 +1100
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 13:10 +1100
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" pedro1492@lycos.com - 2016-03-18 19:07 -0700
Re: "Hard Drive Reliability Review for 2015" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 06:56 +1100
csiph-web