Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips > #831

Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC?

From "Chimbo" <chimbox@gmail.com>
References (1 earlier) <v8uzk206skg.fsf@mailinator.com> <k98n1p$bcd$1@dont-email.me> <50ba8ea1@news.bnb-lp.com> <huvmb8pd0h40ej1pbfpqvct20h68fa8fij@4ax.com> <2c48805c-7d90-482a-a7ef-e42091e46e4c@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt, comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips, comp.sys.intel, alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64
Subject Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC?
Message-ID <20fa510675618febd81006dafd723e4a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink)
Date 2013-03-17 08:20 +0100
Organization mail2news@dizum.com

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In article <2c48805c-7d90-482a-a7ef-
e42091e46e4c@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 11:55 am, Gerald Abrahamson <jerr...@visi.com> wrote:
> >
> > All of this significantly changes the market for
> > computers--in favor of the consumer.
>
> Pipe dreams.  It's all too critical a interdependency of overall
> standards in balance with MPU-dependencies, accounting engineering
> design and third-party chipset support.  No one is interested in
> dumbing it down, a few decades into the past, for stick-toy Lego plug-
> in computer, one size fits all.  This is rocket science, after all, or
> ballistics and code-breaking as computers have heralded -- ostensibly,
> aides to a new age of augmenting accountability to the miniscule --
> and thereby a shifting focus available to modern man, a certain aspect
> to defraying tedium for exactitudes, formerly unavailable to thought
> processes.
>
> This one size, tableted wonder for superceding, of late, is precisely
> consumer oriented.  Well-within expectancies and dependencies society
> has adapted to a provisionary will and role science, as engineers,
> accommodate as Hagel's beneficiary to the commonwealth of all.  Life
> is so simple and easier if in as inasmuch it's an expectancy and
> behest, dare we say, granted and given down to us.  There's less to
> think upon, actually, to exercise will over discretionary matters not
> provided, by course, from advertorial discretion provided by firms
> engaged at Madison and 5th. Ave

Snorrr...

Don't be a defeatist.  Independent builders account for a big 
chunk of revenue.

If US manufacturers decide to cut independents out, the Chinese 
and Indians will only be too happy to cut us back in.

Of course, it wouldn't be the first time Intel did something 
stupid...and ultimately paid the price for it.











Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

The end of the road for the DIY PC? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-11-24 17:46 -0500
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-11-24 18:16 -0500
    Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? "geoff" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-11-24 23:18 -0500
      Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2013-03-19 21:31 +0100
        Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Trent <none@dev.null.pissoff> - 2013-03-20 06:28 -0400
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? "geoff" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-11-24 23:09 -0500
    Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-11-25 18:47 +0000
      Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2012-11-25 22:51 -0500
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Intel Guy <Intel@Guy.com> - 2012-11-24 23:14 -0500
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-24 23:58 -0600
    Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? daytripper <day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> - 2012-11-28 01:33 -0500
      Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-28 03:53 -0600
        Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-11-28 05:56 -0500
          Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-28 18:04 -0600
        Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-11-28 18:34 +0000
          Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? "Chris S." <cside38@nospamverizon.net> - 2012-11-28 13:45 -0500
            Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-11-28 22:10 +0000
          Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-28 17:59 -0600
            Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-11-29 16:58 +0000
        Re: Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? krw@att.bizzz - 2012-11-28 17:12 -0500
          Re: Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-28 22:57 -0600
            Re: Re: Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? krw@att.bizzz - 2012-11-29 00:05 -0500
              Re: Re: Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2012-11-29 00:19 -0600
                Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-11-29 01:26 -0500
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Bug Dout <buggsy2@mailinator.com> - 2012-11-29 12:51 -0800
    Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-11-29 17:19 -0500
      Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2012-12-01 18:11 -0500
        Re: Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Gerald Abrahamson <jerryab@visi.com> - 2012-12-02 10:55 -0600
          Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2012-12-02 15:19 -0800
            Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? "Chimbo" <chimbox@gmail.com> - 2013-03-17 08:20 +0100
  Re: The end of the road for the DIY PC? "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton@btinternet.com> - 2014-07-31 20:30 +0100

csiph-web