Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action > #45995
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action |
| Subject | Re: Random Ramble: EA Abuses its Classics Again |
| Date | Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:10:03 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | the-candyden-of-code |
| Lines | 51 |
| Message-ID | <slrnv5pgng.12dl.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <rllm5jdb04iej64ai65fn5q0kqdvqsn5dv@4ax.com> |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 02 Jun 2024 21:10:04 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="f7dc3b05d7728223b97a2d834de4ae5a"; logging-data="3667029"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rgg63Zsf92/VyUd2Tht0x4W+TkjpmC9eP1jVaFTa0MA==" |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:sOt1VlbRk6QApoMa6WFbqZ5Kiy4= |
| X-Face | b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:45995 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 17:24 this Saturday (GMT):
>
> Well, one classic IP, anyway. Poor "Command & Conquer" is getting
> another mobile version. And yes, it will be just as MTX infested as
> all the previous attempts.
Dang, really?
> But that's not really what I wanted to talk about.
>
> So, I learned about C&C Legions yesterday. It's in the news because
> pre-registration is now underway. Whoop-de-doo, I can preregister for
> a mobile game. That's not going to happen. Still, the "Command &
> Conquer" franchise still has enough cachet for me to at least want to
> see what the game is about. I dutifully click on the link just so I
> can see what sort of game it is.
>
> I did not find out what sort of game it is. Not from the official
> website.
>
> What is it with websites -especially websites for games- that fail to
> give you even the minimum amount of information about the product? All
> the official site had were some non-indicative screenshots and a few
> brief snippets of text ("command iconic units", "engage in real-time
> battles", "seize superweapons").
>
> I mean, you guys WANT me to buy the game, right? You WANT me to
> pre-register. You WANT me to buy the MTX. Give me a reason!
>
> I wish I could say this was only a problem with mobile games, or only
> with games from big-name publishers, but its increasingly common even
> for Indies and free mods! Too often I have to dig through a website
> -or, more often, visit some entirely different website- just to figure
> out what the game is about.
>
> Or I just turn around and decide to find a game that doesn't waste my
> time.
>
><sigh>
>
> Well, I still don't really know what sort of game "Command & Conquer:
> Legions" is going to be... but I don't really care. The little hints I
> could find -and their previous history- make it clear they're not
> offering anything I care about. But it's a shame that EA continues to
> mismanage their beloved IPs in every possible way.
Maybe they want to build hype by not revealing how bad it is? So people
build hope and stuff?
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Random Ramble: EA Abuses its Classics Again Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-01 13:24 -0400 Re: Random Ramble: EA Abuses its Classics Again Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2024-06-01 12:11 -0700 Re: Random Ramble: EA Abuses its Classics Again candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-06-02 19:10 +0000
csiph-web