Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.cbm > #10569
| From | Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.cbm |
| Subject | Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate |
| Date | 2026-05-12 06:00 +0000 |
| Organization | Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate |
| Message-ID | <710b0da3.1.129.305@vk3heg.net> (permalink) |
DW> You could get a nice TCP/IP stack for Win3.1. I think I used Netmanage DW> Chameleon at that time. DW> DW> But for a while it was back to the "smart/rude or nice" rule because the DW> average person could not set up that software. Win95 made it easier for s DW> but I believe that if it wasn't for AOL "opening up" the Internet, the vas DW> majority of people wouldn't have made use of Win95's TCP/IP stack. DW> I'm chuckling because I remember when I was a noob calling BBSes (about age ten) and the older guys telling me about "Q-Bert" as a "/q" would do an abrupt logoff on one particular system... not sure if it was Telegard or Renegade, but some of those guys eventually convinced me to use that software when I opened my first BBS a while after that. I wonder if there really were no AOL but still Windows 95 what would have happened. I've always blamed both of them, but I never considered Win95 w/out AOL. ... I think I'll wait for the 80986.
Back to comp.sys.cbm | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> - 2026-05-12 06:00 +0000
csiph-web