Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2 > #3029 > unrolled thread
| Started by | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-10-15 17:38 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-10-20 01:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 12 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.apple2
AppleColor RGB all-red display dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) - 2011-10-15 17:38 +0000
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) - 2011-10-15 17:41 +0000
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Grent <grent3@gmail.com> - 2011-10-15 17:33 -0700
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) - 2011-10-17 20:47 +0000
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) - 2011-10-18 14:19 +0000
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2011-10-18 12:05 -0500
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) - 2011-10-18 17:41 +0000
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Grent <grent3@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 23:27 -0700
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Alex Freed <alex_news@alexfreed.com> - 2011-10-19 02:10 -0700
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2011-10-19 16:08 -0500
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Kevin Dady <kevin@hackaday.com> - 2011-10-19 18:16 -0700
Re: AppleColor RGB all-red display Alex Freed <alex_news@alexfreed.com> - 2011-10-20 01:25 -0700
| From | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-15 17:38 +0000 |
| Subject | AppleColor RGB all-red display |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1318700300@macgui.com> |
I was fiddling with my AppleColor RGB (for the IIgs) yesterday, and I managed to break it. I was trying to figure out why the voltage to the screen was increasing, thus making the intensity slowly ramp up as the electronics got warmer over about 10 minutes. I measured voltage across a 4.7k Ohm resistor on the CRT board (the one that connects to the neck of the CRT) and it was about 50 volts. I then measured across the identical (?) 4.7k Ohm resistor on the left side of the same board. This is where things went wrong. I have an analog multimeter, and when I connected the leads, the needle went back, like negative voltage. I assumed this meant that I had the leads the wrong way around, so I reversed them. I got a spark, a zap, and a nasty smell. A second later, the display went all red. I turned off the monitor. I searched the Apple II FAQs, and found in the Monitors, question 008- "Suddenly my monitor has an all-blue (all-red, etc.) screen! How do I fix this?" Well, I measured the resistance across all three inductors, and they were all about 10k Ohms. I powered on the monitor and measured the voltage drop, which was negligible (the needle barely moved). So, now I must assume that some other component blew up and made the nasty smell. Any ideas? I'm not really good at doing electronics, so I'm going to have a graybeard help me with the repairs. -- ]DF$ Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh computing. http://macgui.com/vault/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-15 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1318700486@macgui.com> |
| In reply to | #3029 |
Oh, yeah. To add: I do get recognizable video. I can see the IIgs desktop, icons, menubar, etc. It's just that everything is a shade of red. And it's all intense red.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grent <grent3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-15 17:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e574833a-055e-40b6-9e78-3e90dd8f283b@v28g2000vby.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #3030 |
On Oct 15, 1:41 pm, dog_...@macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote:
> Oh, yeah. To add: I do get recognizable video. I can see the IIgs desktop,
> icons, menubar, etc. It's just that everything is a shade of red. And it's
> all intense red.
Usually it was a choke that would cause the color shift that you were
talking. Some how I want to say 47microheneries. There was one for
each of the 3 colors. Not sure these green and black things that look
like caps are them or if they look like a resistor that has a coil
wrapped around it. Then again you could have fried something else.
Take Care
George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-17 20:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1318884477@macgui.com> |
| In reply to | #3033 |
Grent wrote: > On Oct 15, 1:41�pm, dog_...@macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote: >> Oh, yeah. To add: I do get recognizable video. I can see the IIgs >> desktop, >> icons, menubar, etc. It's just that everything is a shade of red. And >> it's >> all intense red. > > Usually it was a choke that would cause the color shift that you were > talking. Some how I want to say 47microheneries. There was one for > each of the 3 colors. Not sure these green and black things that look > like caps are them or if they look like a resistor that has a coil > wrapped around it. Then again you could have fried something else. > I stopped in with the local graybeard and showed him the schematics, plus told him the testing that I'd done. His best guess was that the NPN transistor that controls the red beam has failed. This is the transistor that's near the inductor and 4.7k resistor on the CRT board. I'm going to test it this evening (or tomorrow morning if it's too late) and report back.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-18 14:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1318947543@macgui.com> |
| In reply to | #3067 |
The story continues: Yes, it was a bad transistor for the red channel. It tested differently compared to the blue and green transistors. Using better light, I could also see scorch marks on the PCB from where I'd apparently made a short circuit the other day. Next step now is to find out what kind of transistor it is, and get a replacement part. -- ]DF$ Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh computing. http://macgui.com/vault/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-18 12:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1017933621340649675.448169mjmahon-aol.com@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #3094 |
D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote:
> The story continues:
>
> Yes, it was a bad transistor for the red channel. It tested differently
> compared to the blue and green transistors. Using better light, I could also
> see scorch marks on the PCB from where I'd apparently made a short circuit
> the other day.
>
> Next step now is to find out what kind of transistor it is, and get a
> replacement part.
Glad you found it.
I'd guess a high voltage (50-70v) medium beta NPN. After replacement you
may need to adjust the red brightness ("screen") and contrast ("gain") to
get the colors right again.
-michael - NadaNet 3.1 and AppleCrate II: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-18 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1318959702@macgui.com> |
| In reply to | #3107 |
Michael J. Mahon wrote:
> D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote:
>> The story continues:
>>
>> Yes, it was a bad transistor for the red channel. It tested differently
>> compared to the blue and green transistors. Using better light, I could
>> also
>> see scorch marks on the PCB from where I'd apparently made a short
>> circuit
>> the other day.
>>
>> Next step now is to find out what kind of transistor it is, and get a
>> replacement part.
>
> Glad you found it.
>
> I'd guess a high voltage (50-70v) medium beta NPN. After replacement you
> may need to adjust the red brightness ("screen") and contrast ("gain") to
> get the colors right again.
>
I just researched the transistor number, and it appears to be a standard
part: C2688.
<http://search.digikey.com/us/en/cat/discrete-semiconductor-products/transistors-bjt-single/1376376?k=c2688>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grent <grent3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-18 23:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5000ed24-94dd-4ad8-9564-648e102f1bd2@k35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #3109 |
On Oct 18, 1:41 pm, dog_...@macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote:
> Michael J. Mahon wrote:
> > D Finnigan <dog_...@macgui.com> wrote:
> >> The story continues:
>
> >> Yes, it was a bad transistor for the red channel. It tested differently
> >> compared to the blue and green transistors. Using better light, I could
> >> also
> >> see scorch marks on the PCB from where I'd apparently made a short
> >> circuit
> >> the other day.
>
> >> Next step now is to find out what kind of transistor it is, and get a
> >> replacement part.
>
> > Glad you found it.
>
> > I'd guess a high voltage (50-70v) medium beta NPN. After replacement you
> > may need to adjust the red brightness ("screen") and contrast ("gain") to
> > get the colors right again.
>
> I just researched the transistor number, and it appears to be a standard
> part: C2688.
>
> <http://search.digikey.com/us/en/cat/discrete-semiconductor-products/t...>
Yes thank you for posting the information
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alex Freed <alex_news@alexfreed.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-19 02:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <j7m45u$u64$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #3109 |
On 10/18/2011 10:41 AM, D Finnigan wrote: > I just researched the transistor number, and it appears to be a standard > part: C2688. > > <http://search.digikey.com/us/en/cat/discrete-semiconductor-products/transistors-bjt-single/1376376?k=c2688> Standard, yes. But not a stocked item. Nothing magical about it: easy to find a substitute. Key parameters are 300V, 10 Watt, 200 mA max current, hFE 40 to 150 and 50 MHz. http://alltransistors.com/crsearch.php?mat=Si&struct=npn&pc=10W&ucb=300V&uce=300V&ueb=5V&ic=0.2&tj=150%C2%B0C&ft=50MHz&cc=3&hfe=40/160&mnf=&caps= 81 results found :) -Alex.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-19 16:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1156471631340747923.619618mjmahon-aol.com@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #3137 |
Alex Freed <alex_news@alexfreed.com> wrote: > On 10/18/2011 10:41 AM, D Finnigan wrote: > >> I just researched the transistor number, and it appears to be a standard >> part: C2688. >> >> <http://search.digikey.com/us/en/cat/discrete-semiconductor-products/transistors-bjt-single/1376376?k=c2688> > > Standard, yes. But not a stocked item. Nothing magical about it: easy to > find a substitute. Key parameters are 300V, 10 Watt, 200 mA max current, > hFE 40 to 150 and 50 MHz. > > http://alltransistors.com/crsearch.php?mat=Si&struct=npn&pc=10W&ucb=300V&uce=300V&ueb=5V&ic=0.2&tj=150%C2%B0C&ft=50MHz&cc=3&hfe=40/160&mnf=&caps= > > 81 results found :) > > -Alex. Wow! That seems inordinately beefy for a video output transistor. ;-). 10W? And 300v seems like a lot for a transistor stage that only needs to drive a CRT grid/cathode... Sounds like a significant overdesign. -michael - NadaNet 3.1 and AppleCrate II: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Dady <kevin@hackaday.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-19 18:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6c57e94d-0331-4cf0-8b4a-6edf4cdf6794@g25g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #3162 |
On Oct 19, 4:08 pm, Michael J. Mahon <mjma...@aol.com> wrote: > Alex Freed <alex_n...@alexfreed.com> wrote: > > On 10/18/2011 10:41 AM, D Finnigan wrote: > > >> I just researched the transistor number, and it appears to be a standard > >> part: C2688. > > >> <http://search.digikey.com/us/en/cat/discrete-semiconductor-products/t...> > > > Standard, yes. But not a stocked item. Nothing magical about it: easy to > > find a substitute. Key parameters are 300V, 10 Watt, 200 mA max current, > > hFE 40 to 150 and 50 MHz. > > >http://alltransistors.com/crsearch.php?mat=Si&struct=npn&pc=10W&ucb=3... > > > 81 results found :) > > > -Alex. > > Wow! That seems inordinately beefy for a video output transistor. ;-). > 10W? And 300v seems like a lot for a transistor stage that only needs to > drive a CRT grid/cathode... > > Sounds like a significant overdesign. > > -michael - NadaNet 3.1 and AppleCrate II:http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon they probably got a deal in bulk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alex Freed <alex_news@alexfreed.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-10-20 01:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <j7olst$3on$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #3162 |
On 10/19/2011 2:08 PM, Michael J. Mahon wrote: > Wow! That seems inordinately beefy for a video output transistor. ;-). > 10W? And 300v seems like a lot for a transistor stage that only needs to > drive a CRT grid/cathode... > > Sounds like a significant overdesign. Not as much as one would think. A voltage of 200 V is quite typical for driving a CRT. In order to have good frequency response you need to use a relatively low load resistor - say 10K. So we have 20 mA of current and up to 4 W heating up the transistor. Add a little safety margin and you get a circuit that works for 25 years till someone makes a short :) So it's a bit of an overkill, but reasonable. Medium power transistors are cheap. -Alex.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.apple2
csiph-web