Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #2160
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 22:54 -0800 |
| References | <dec2c6fc-3c74-40e8-a655-fca8451d9a1b@googlegroups.com> <n7m37d$7u9$2@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <725985d1-5ba1-4cf2-b2e4-3b742f2b6413@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs |
| From | michael.pohoreski@gmail.com |
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 11:36:13 AM UTC-8, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > PS: I's like to see your reaction on some nice posting of mine here on > the AppleWin debugger "crap" bloating the actual emulation core... Wait, when did we switch over to comp.emulators.apple2.advocacy? I must have missed that memo. :-) You made 3 mistakes: 1. You're under the delusion that my ego would be bruised. You won't get any argument from me! AppleWin's debugger (still) sucks, hopefully, just less over time. 2. I didn't even write the original code, and 3. Let's compare screenshots of how *horrible* it was before I got involved: http://imgur.com/a/qEKOW Ow my eyes! Lastly, you haven't seen my "65d02" ideas providing a real-time heat map, inline sprite display, and other fun stuff. I'm quite well aware that debugging is a performance hog. One day users will be able to disable all the *debugger crap* for those that _don't_ need it, and the few that _do_ can enable it. So go ahead and post your feedback & criticism (over in c.e.a2) It's the fastest way to help improve it. :-) Michael
Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs michael.pohoreski@gmail.com - 2016-01-15 21:26 -0800
Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs michael.pohoreski@gmail.com - 2016-01-16 09:24 -0800
Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs michael.pohoreski@gmail.com - 2016-01-16 16:13 -0800
Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-19 19:36 +0000
Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs michael.pohoreski@gmail.com - 2016-01-19 22:54 -0800
Re: cc65: ca65 + ld65 without all the library crap for "pure" assembly programs michael.pohoreski@gmail.com - 2016-01-20 07:21 -0800
csiph-web