Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.amiga.emulations > #17
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.amiga.emulations |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-10 19:10 -0700 |
| References | <1993May6.161156.22836@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1t32u0INN7ff@iraun1.ira.uka.de> <JKH.93May16000057@whisker.lotus.ie> <1tr9okINNkvc@iraun1.ira.uka.de> |
| Message-ID | <88c88765-2eba-4399-9b7f-7d104b9c16ban@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Amiga Linux |
| From | the best of the world <nicebeatskklk@gmail.com> |
Em segunda-feira, 24 de maio de 1993 às 17:04:36 UTC-3, Guenther Grau escreveu: > In article <JKH.93Ma...@whisker.lotus.ie>, j...@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) writes: > |> [Copy of email sent to Guenther] > Didn't get any email from you by now. > |> > |> I have only one question: Why are you starting with Linux? > |> > |> I've looked at putting Unix on the Amiga and see only two really > |> practical alternatives: BSDSS on top of Kludge Mach (BSDSS is about to > |> be resumed at CMU, see announcement on the 27th of May) or 386bsd with > |> the contributed HP300/400 code (all 68K based). > |> > |> The reason I'd recommend 386bsd at all is for the simple reason that > |> the 386 specific code has been largely isolated to one area of the > |> code, and that there's already 68K code becoming available as part of > |> the BSD 4.4 efforts on HP 68040 boxes. > |> > |> On the BSDSS front, things look much better, with a running Mach > |> already on the Amiga and a free unix server looking like it's finally > |> in the cards (CMU had backed away from BSDSS for awhile due to the > |> USL->BSDI crap). > |> > |> Linux is about the worst place to start from, given the Intel specific > |> stuff scattered all throughout the code - better to write a Linux > |> server on top of Mach if it's "linux behaviour" you're looking for - > |> that would at least save you from having to do all the messy VM stuff > |> again. Linus himself has said that he never really intended Linux to > |> run on anything but PC's, and he wasn't all that careful about putting > |> all the PC specific stuff in one place. > |> > |> > |> Like I said, I'd go Mach or BSD. What stage are you people at? > |> -- > |> Jordan Hubbard Lotus Development Ireland j...@whisker.lotus.ie > Hi Jordan, hi world! > I want to clear things up a bit and answer your question, why we are 'starting' > with Linux. > I have followed the discussions about Unix on the Amiga for about two years now. > I have concluded the following, please correct me if I am wrong: > There is a community of Amiga-freaks who like to unix (never tried it as a verb > before) on their Amiga, including me. I haven't been able to pay for the > commercial version from CBM (Amix), but was willing to work for a PD-version of > AmigaUnix, i.e. to do some programming for it. > I haven't had a look at the mach-sources you mention above, but I have to say, > that the work around it got quite silent. I don't now what the current stage is, > but I haven't seen anything working around, nor a statement when it will be > available. I, too, don't know, how much work will have to be invested in porting > BSDSS to KludgeMach on the 680x0. > What I do know is, that some people have been working on a port of AmigaLinux for > a long time, but the team of porters fizzled. An independent work of this group > was done by Hamish, who got quite far without the help of anybody. He released > his work to the public in order to find other programmers helping him on his > port. It was a 'working' kernel, with most of the drivers missing, and therefore > it was (it still is, although some drivers have already been addad).only useable > for other developers. > As this is the (IMHO) most promising effort underway at the moment, I am > willing to join this team as soon as I am able to (need 68030-board for A1000). I > don't want to see the port ending up into a discussion, where to start the port. > I want to do some real work and the sources provided by Hamish are the best way > to do. I don't want to discuss, if it is better to port mach and then bsdss or > 386bsd or anything else, but I want to join the most promising effort to have > Un*x running SOON on your Amiga. > I haven't heard about the 386bsd-port to HP 68040 boxes. Maybe you can email me > about that. I am not willing to reinvent the wheel. If there is something, we can > merge into AmigaLinux and it helps us saving time then, of course, it will be > merged with the current port of AmigaLinux. > That's all for now. Any questions and comments welcome. > Guenther > ---------------------- > Guenther Grau, Willy-Andreas-Allee 7, D-7500 (76131) Karlsruhe 1, FRG > Institute for Dialoque- and Operatingsystems, University of Karlsruhe > Home : +49 721 23445 > Fax : +49 721 697 760 > s_g...@ira.uka.de true
Back to comp.sys.amiga.emulations | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Amiga Linux the best of the world <nicebeatskklk@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:10 -0700
Re: Amiga Linux yello gore <quin774@mailfence.com> - 2023-07-29 18:51 -0700
Re: Amiga Linux August Benefiel <augustbenefiel@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 23:23 -0700
csiph-web