Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #4260 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-03-13 20:25 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-03-20 12:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 65 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc
Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 20:25 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-13 21:55 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 22:21 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-14 12:15 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-14 10:50 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-14 10:07 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-15 01:40 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 16:31 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-14 20:12 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 22:08 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-14 23:46 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]> - 2012-03-15 00:59 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-15 12:44 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-15 21:42 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 05:21 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-16 23:49 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 18:32 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-18 11:31 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 00:35 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-18 22:08 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-17 22:53 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 08:19 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 08:39 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-18 22:40 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-18 10:32 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Grahame Parish <spamtrap@millers-way.net> - 2012-03-18 12:10 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 10:24 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 01:00 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-14 16:55 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:06 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 23:29 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-14 01:00 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-14 14:39 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 19:18 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-15 00:57 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-16 12:03 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 05:29 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 10:29 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 15:41 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-19 16:52 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-20 23:26 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:55 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:54 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:57 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-23 13:16 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Gransden <chrisg@care4free.net> - 2012-03-23 12:59 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-23 18:13 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 18:50 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-24 09:42 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-23 17:53 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-23 13:18 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 14:03 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-23 14:38 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 15:52 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:43 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 18:41 +0100
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:40 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-24 03:25 +1300
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 12:17 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-23 18:32 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 07:06 +0000
Re: Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:34 +0000
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-13 20:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Exit desktop on Task Manager menu. |
| Message-ID | <2b0bf96f52.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> |
Is there any remaining reason for having the Exit Desktop entry on the
Task manager menu? I write as someone who occasionally clicks on this
by mistake instead of on Shutdown, resulting in an unusable screen.
Just wondering ...
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / zfc Hf \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
and \/ __ __ \ England.
family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/ \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-13 21:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jjofnk$sjp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4260 |
On 13/03/2012 20:25, Peter Young wrote: > Is there any remaining reason for having the Exit Desktop entry on the > Task manager menu? I'm sure someone somewhere uses it to drop out of the Wimp and run their old Arthur era software, such as GraphicWriter. > I write as someone who occasionally clicks on this > by mistake instead of on Shutdown, You can get back in to the desktop with *desktop, then use shutdown so the Iyonix switches off. > resulting in an unusable screen. You need to *configure the MonitorType, Mode and Sync settings correctly. Try 5, 28 and 0 ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-13 22:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <97bd037052.chris@o2.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4264 |
In message <jjofnk$sjp$1@dont-email.me>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 13/03/2012 20:25, Peter Young wrote:
>> Is there any remaining reason for having the Exit Desktop entry on the
>> Task manager menu?
> I'm sure someone somewhere uses it to drop out of the Wimp and run their
> old Arthur era software, such as GraphicWriter.
>> I write as someone who occasionally clicks on this
>> by mistake instead of on Shutdown,
> You can get back in to the desktop with *desktop, then use shutdown so
> the Iyonix switches off.
Does not work on the ARMini as I just found out!
--
Chris Hughes
Come to the Wakefield Show - 28th April 2012
http://www.wakefieldshow.org.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 12:15 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <46a7087052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #4265 |
In message <97bd037052.chris@o2.co.uk>
Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <jjofnk$sjp$1@dont-email.me>
> druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 13/03/2012 20:25, Peter Young wrote:
> >> Is there any remaining reason for having the Exit Desktop entry on the
> >> Task manager menu?
>
> > I'm sure someone somewhere uses it to drop out of the Wimp and run their
> > old Arthur era software, such as GraphicWriter.
>
> >> I write as someone who occasionally clicks on this
> >> by mistake instead of on Shutdown,
>
> > You can get back in to the desktop with *desktop, then use shutdown so
> > the Iyonix switches off.
>
> Does not work on the ARMini as I just found out!
>
>
>
It is not working on Iyonix 5.18, It does work with RiscPC 5.19
Is their different functionality to using F12?
Actually it looks a better option than using F12, as I often nudge
the F12 by mistake. Cntrl+F12 doesn't have the same problem,
maybe it is possible to map F12 to Cntrl+Shift+F12 to avoid this.
Ron M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <T27042bb27Paul@sprie.nl> |
| In reply to | #4266 |
In article <46a7087052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz>,
Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote:
> Actually it looks a better option than using F12, as I often nudge
> the F12 by mistake. Cntrl+F12 doesn't have the same problem,
> maybe it is possible to map F12 to Cntrl+Shift+F12 to avoid this.
There's a module that transposes F12 and Ctrl-F12.. Since it's only 207
bytes large (shorter than the text of this mail), I dare to challenge the
netiquette and attach it here.
Put it into your !Boot.Choices.Boot.Tasks directory and enjoy the pleasure
of invoking the much appreciated task window with a single press on F12.
Kind regards,
Paul Sprangers
begin 644 Ctrlf12
M.`````````!,`````````(@```"0````K```````````````````````````
M````-`````$````4`*#C(!"/X@`@H.-'``#O$0``[P!`+>D4`*#C"!"/X@`@
MH.,@``+O`("]Z```4>,%```:S`!0X^P`H`,"```*[`!0X\P`H`/___\*#O"@
MX4-T<FQF,3(`0W1R;&8Q,@DQ+C`P("@R-R!*=6P@,C`P-"D``$-T<FQF,3(`
8````````````````R```````````````
`
end
RiscOS filetype : FFA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 10:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4550447052.cferris@cferris.freeuk.com> |
| In reply to | #4277 |
In message <T27042bb27Paul@sprie.nl>
Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> wrote:
> In article <46a7087052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz>,
> Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > Actually it looks a better option than using F12, as I often nudge
> > the F12 by mistake. Cntrl+F12 doesn't have the same problem,
> > maybe it is possible to map F12 to Cntrl+Shift+F12 to avoid this.
>
> There's a module that transposes F12 and Ctrl-F12.. Since it's only
> 207 bytes large (shorter than the text of this mail), I dare to
> challenge the netiquette and attach it here.
>
> Put it into your !Boot.Choices.Boot.Tasks directory and enjoy the
> pleasure of invoking the much appreciated task window with a single
> press on F12.
>
In the past - did anyone do module - that brought up the 'taskwindow'
from 'adjust clicking' on the Task icon?
--
Colin Ferris Cornwall UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-15 01:40 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <6f58527052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #4278 |
In message <4550447052.cferris@cferris.freeuk.com>
cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid wrote:
> In message <T27042bb27Paul@sprie.nl>
> Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> wrote:
>
> > In article <46a7087052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz>,
> > Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote:
> >
> > > Actually it looks a better option than using F12, as I often nudge
> > > the F12 by mistake. Cntrl+F12 doesn't have the same problem,
> > > maybe it is possible to map F12 to Cntrl+Shift+F12 to avoid this.
> >
> > There's a module that transposes F12 and Ctrl-F12.. Since it's only
> > 207 bytes large (shorter than the text of this mail), I dare to
> > challenge the netiquette and attach it here.
> >
> > Put it into your !Boot.Choices.Boot.Tasks directory and enjoy the
> > pleasure of invoking the much appreciated task window with a single
> > press on F12.
> >
But it is the plain F12 that gets accidentally hit while going for the
backspace key, -if both Task and TaskWindow needed a combination, this
couldn't happen.
>
> In the past - did anyone do module - that brought up the 'taskwindow'
> from 'adjust clicking' on the Task icon?
>
I guess one reason you might want to be still at your mouse after
opening a TW would be to position the newly opened window.Another
might be if you have !Typer or similar loaded with commands to
send to it by mouseclick.
I think Peters query(complaint?) about the 'Exit desktop' is
quite right, as it leaves you with a hung computer. Also it is very
close to the 'Shutdown'.
The 'Exit Desktop' does appear to be shutting things down properly
as I get a similar delay with a normal shutdown. I wonder if you
would be left with any network to use?
Ron M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 16:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5270678689Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4284 |
In article <6f58527052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz>, Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote: > But it is the plain F12 that gets accidentally hit while going for the > backspace key, -if both Task and TaskWindow needed a combination, this > couldn't happen. Depends on your keyboard :-) This oldish Dell (AT102W) I'm using has a good keycap height spacing between the number keys row and the function key row. Looking across at my wife's keyboard the spacing isn't much different to that btween the other rows. -- Stuart Winsor Only plain text for emails http://www.asciiribbon.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 20:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jjqu2p$hp5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4284 |
On 14/03/2012 12:40, Ron wrote: > The 'Exit Desktop' does appear to be shutting things down properly > as I get a similar delay with a normal shutdown. I wonder if you > would be left with any network to use? Exiting the desktop just quits any Wimp Tasks and exits to the supervisor command prompt. All the underlying OS facilities are still available including networking. Shutdown quits all Wimp tasks and stops at a shutdown screen. Additionally on the Iyonix, and other more recent hardware with power management, it turns off the machine. ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 22:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5762867052.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4292 |
On 14 Mar 2012 druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 14/03/2012 12:40, Ron wrote:
>> The 'Exit Desktop' does appear to be shutting things down properly
>> as I get a similar delay with a normal shutdown. I wonder if you
>> would be left with any network to use?
> Exiting the desktop just quits any Wimp Tasks and exits to the
> supervisor command prompt. All the underlying OS facilities are still
> available including networking.
But both with the Iyo and with this ARMini there's never any command
prompt. Hence the original whinge from me!
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / zfc Hf \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
and \/ __ __ \ England.
family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/ \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 23:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52708f53eechrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> |
| In reply to | #4295 |
In article <5762867052.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote: > But both with the Iyo and with this ARMini there's never any > command prompt. Hence the original whinge from me! I have just tried it on my Iyonix here (5.18 OS) and it seems to just do a normal shutdown (including warnings about unsaved files etc). It certainly didn't go to any star prompt. On a test of one sample, it seems to completely mirror the normal C-S-F12 or Shutdown from the menu. I guess mthe ARMini will be similar - I'll try it tomorrow. -- Chris Johnson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 23:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5270905289chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> |
| In reply to | #4297 |
Now, that's strange. I tried again. It did get to the supervisor prompt this time (there were no interruptions this time with files to save or messages from Alarm etc since I had just rebooted - does cancelling these alerts cause it to restart the exit as a normal shutdown?). However, trying to reenter the desktop resulted in a freeze at the RISC OS Banner. Resort to Alt-Break gave a Data abort type of error. Ended up having to use the reset button. -- Chris Johnson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-15 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mpro.m0wirz007zchi02f3@ypical.nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4298 |
In message <5270905289chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net>
Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> wrote:
> Now, that's strange. I tried again. It did get to the supervisor
> prompt this time (there were no interruptions this time with files to
> save or messages from Alarm etc since I had just rebooted - does
> cancelling these alerts cause it to restart the exit as a normal
> shutdown?). However, trying to reenter the desktop resulted in a
> freeze at the RISC OS Banner. Resort to Alt-Break gave a Data abort
> type of error. Ended up having to use the reset button.
That's what I get on my BB -xM though if I kill 'Unknown' after the
Alt-Break and wait a long time it returns to the desktop with the pinboard
image absent & the files and applications set to run don't. Configure works
though.
--
Fred
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-15 12:44 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <5d2b8f7052.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #4292 |
In message <jjqu2p$hp5$1@dont-email.me>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 14/03/2012 12:40, Ron wrote:
> > The 'Exit Desktop' does appear to be shutting things down properly
> > as I get a similar delay with a normal shutdown. I wonder if you
> > would be left with any network to use?
>
> Exiting the desktop just quits any Wimp Tasks and exits to the
> supervisor command prompt. All the underlying OS facilities are still
> available including networking.
>
The Iyonix stops at a grey screen and an active mouse pointer.
Both Access and Moonfish are still working at this point.
If these are Wimp Tasks then the 'Exit Desktop' isn't completing.
How do you draw the line between a Wimp Task and an OS facility?
I assume polling is a low level OS function that always happens.
Ron M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-15 21:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jjtnno$hd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4296 |
On 14/03/2012 23:44, Ron wrote: > The Iyonix stops at a grey screen and an active mouse pointer. > Both Access and Moonfish are still working at this point. > If these are Wimp Tasks then the 'Exit Desktop' isn't completing. Both Access and Moonfish have wimp front ends to allow connections to be established from the desktop, but the actual remote filing system functionality is provided by modules, and is active regardless of whether the desktop is running. > How do you draw the line between a Wimp Task and an OS facility? I refer you to the RISC OS Programmers Reference Manuals if you want a fuller explanation. > I assume polling is a low level OS function that always happens. No, polling is purely a Wimp thing. Underneath RISC OS is a single tasking command line based OS, just like DOS. ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-16 05:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.9152344553989570194@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4327 |
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:42:19 +0000, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: >> How do you draw the line between a Wimp Task and an OS facility? > I refer you to the RISC OS Programmers Reference Manuals if you want a > fuller explanation. Do the PRMs actually spell this out? ;-) I would suggest that something that offers functional SWIs, *commands and maybe service calls is an OS facility. If it multitasks, it is a wimp task. While there is some crossover for OS facilities (*Filer_OpenDir, text editor as a relocatable module, etc), it is a pretty safe bet that anything that runs in the wimp is a wimp task. Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-16 23:49 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <a2e14f7152.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #4332 |
In message <almarsoft.9152344553989570194@news.orange.fr>
Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:42:19 +0000, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
>
> >> How do you draw the line between a Wimp Task and an OS facility?
> > I refer you to the RISC OS Programmers Reference Manuals if you
> want a
> > fuller explanation.
>
> Do the PRMs actually spell this out? ;-)
>
>
> I would suggest that something that offers functional SWIs, *commands
> and maybe service calls is an OS facility.
> If it multitasks, it is a wimp task.
>
Confusingly, *Wimptask <command> gives the appearance of singletasking
and all other wimp (desktop) activity appears to be frozen.
F12 also gives this impression.
Obviously they are single task interfaces to the user, but is there
still wimptask polling going on below?
I feel Networking is an example of multitasking (without the wimp),
As it can do several things at any time.
Access with one computer and NFS with another would have to be in
the multitasking category.
But if you started a network ftp or whatever in a taskwindow, then
left the Desktop with Exit desktop would the connection stay alive?
> While there is some crossover for OS facilities (*Filer_OpenDir, text
> editor as a relocatable module, etc), it is a pretty safe bet that
> anything that runs in the wimp is a wimp task.
>
As before, what about *Wimptask and F12 prompt?
I dont have experience with *ShellCLI or Exit desktop(Supervisor?)
but it sounds like at least Supervisor has no wimptasks/polling.
I have found very little on *ShellCLI and that is why Steves alias
caught my eye.
A bit of experimenting may reveal the answers to some of my questions.
Thanks Ron M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-16 18:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.5627869513376582171@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4335 |
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 23:49:47 +1300, Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote: >> I would suggest that something that offers functional SWIs, *commands >> and maybe service calls is an OS facility. >> If it multitasks, it is a wimp task. > Confusingly, *Wimptask <command> gives the appearance of singletasking It depends upon the command. *WimpTask is for starting multitasking tasks. If you run a single-tasking program, then it'll act as such. It doesn't magically convert software to work in the desktop (that's what TaskWindow is for). > and all other wimp (desktop) activity appears to be frozen. > F12 also gives this impression. > Obviously they are single task interfaces to the user, but is there > still wimptask polling going on below? No. The desktop operates co-operatively. Simple experiment - run WebJames, fetch a largish file from another computer, and in the middle press F12 and watch the transfer cease as in the command line the desktop (and all multitasking) is frozen. Really, if we had a half-decent TaskWindow, we could consign F12 as another anacronism of the past... > I feel Networking is an example of multitasking (without the wimp), > As it can do several things at any time. So could a filing system on a BBC micro. Don't confuse "runs on timers and interrupts" with modern multitasking. That sort of thing has been the mainstay of computing since the dawn of time (there's a hell of a lot going on *besides* your program, on any computer anywhere). Networking and such is designed to tuck itself away into the background and just provide useful services, like the Freeway module recently discussed. Multitasking, the modern definition, is a collection of user-facing applications side by side. > But if you started a network ftp or whatever in a taskwindow, then > left the Desktop with Exit desktop would the connection stay alive? Probably not, as surely that would terminate the TaskWindow? > I dont have experience with *ShellCLI or Exit desktop(Supervisor?) > but it sounds like at least Supervisor has no wimptasks/polling. It doesn't. > I have found very little on *ShellCLI and that is why Steves alias > caught my eye. I think it is an internal mechanism to call the supervisor command line within a desktop environment without it all going tits up. > A bit of experimenting may reveal the answers to some of my questions. Me? I'd just look at the sources. ;-) Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 11:31 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <6ff8137252.beeb@ron1954.woosh.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #4340 |
In message <almarsoft.5627869513376582171@news.orange.fr>
Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > I have found very little on *ShellCLI and that is why Steves alias
> > caught my eye.
>
> I think it is an internal mechanism to call the supervisor command
> line within a desktop environment without it all going tits up.
>
>
> > A bit of experimenting may reveal the answers to some of my
> questions.
>
> Me? I'd just look at the sources. ;-)
>
http://acorn.riscos.com/riscos3/37/37DiscImage/Manuals/Manual/BOOK3B/BOOK3_2.HT
Has an overview of the command line from the User manual.
It appears that 'Supervisor' doesn't necessarily mean anything other
than an ordinary command line.
There is a Wimp$State variable that is either Desktop or Commands,
indicating that leaving the Desktop on it's own and you still have
Wimp activity.
The Exit option leaves the Desktop and additionally closes any tasks,
making it different to the F12 alternatives.
I'm guessing Wimp activity is still there with the Wimp$State set
to Commands.
Anyway, for the OP, something new I have come across during this
thread, is that you can do a fast shutdown using CNTRL+SHIFT+F12.
And for Clumsy typist's that find the live F12 key upsets the flow,
It can be disabled by using
Set Alias$ShellCLI ""
The good thing is that CNTRL+F12 still works for a TW Command Line,
and full functionality can be turned back on with
UnSet Alias$ShellCLI
Thanks to Steve for showing the way to this tip, There are much
larger utilities around that dont do it any better.
Ron M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 00:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.2307002416962051194@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4351 |
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:31:36 +1300, Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> wrote: > It appears that 'Supervisor' doesn't necessarily mean anything other > than an ordinary command line. That's about it, yes. I think it's a hangover from the 6502 machines. > There is a Wimp$State variable that is either Desktop or Commands, > indicating that leaving the Desktop on it's own and you still have > Wimp activity. In a manner of speaking. The Wimp is still "there" but it is inactive. Much like if you aren't currently riding a bike, the bike doesn't cease being. The Wimp activity will restart upon returning to the desktop environment. I think the Wimp$State is to be checked so you don't try to initialise yourself as a Wimp task outside of the Wimp; but few bother doing that as most people work in the ooooh-clicky! environment anyway. ;-) Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.misc
csiph-web