Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #3879 > unrolled thread
| Started by | ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-03-01 17:52 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-03-08 13:35 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 58 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc
The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-03-01 17:52 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-01 17:57 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ian Hamilton <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> - 2012-03-01 18:10 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-01 18:17 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-01 22:20 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Richard Torrens (News)" <News+15404@Torrens.org.uk> - 2012-03-05 12:42 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 16:35 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-05 18:36 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 19:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Richard Travers <richtnews@uwclub.net> - 2012-03-06 09:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 10:45 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 15:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 19:22 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 20:45 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-07 15:44 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 17:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! church <church@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 19:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:11 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 10:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 11:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 12:23 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 13:46 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 15:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:11 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 18:01 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 18:51 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 14:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-09 17:28 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 20:15 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:28 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:38 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:05 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:11 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 10:46 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:23 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:29 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 16:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 17:28 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 18:25 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 23:25 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-12 20:55 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-12 22:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 12:57 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:21 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 13:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-14 18:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 20:10 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-15 21:30 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 17:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-15 08:42 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 11:03 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-18 10:04 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 09:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 10:54 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 11:52 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 12:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:03 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 16:23 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 16:57 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 17:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-10 21:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:44 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 04:09 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 06:52 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 08:38 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 10:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-11 11:04 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 10:31 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:31 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:23 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:46 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:15 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 07:12 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:15 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 08:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:49 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-14 11:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:54 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 21:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-17 22:54 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 00:45 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-18 09:25 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 15:36 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:52 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 17:56 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 20:12 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:05 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-18 22:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 11:07 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 14:39 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 13:32 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 14:56 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:09 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 11:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ollie Clark <usenet@ollieclark.com> - 2012-03-29 10:38 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-29 11:52 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-29 15:29 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-29 21:50 +0200
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-30 08:53 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-30 17:57 +0200
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 22:17 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:06 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:24 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:43 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 05:51 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-04 07:11 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-12 12:42 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-04-12 20:08 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 12:46 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:50 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 00:16 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:53 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 09:40 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-13 09:49 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:18 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:41 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 11:26 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 11:32 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 14:41 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 01:01 +0200
OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 13:54 +0100
OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 20:16 +0200
Re: OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 19:50 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-29 20:28 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:02 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:28 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:54 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:36 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:04 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:55 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:30 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 10:39 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:08 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:07 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:55 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 10:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:03 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:12 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 10:53 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 12:49 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:07 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:29 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:53 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 05:51 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:07 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 20:23 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 21:41 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 07:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:47 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:41 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 20:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 22:11 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:57 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:38 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-22 18:12 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess Hampshire <jesshampshire@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-23 11:59 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 13:15 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-23 13:56 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:36 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:58 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Richard Travers <richtnews@uwclub.net> - 2012-03-23 09:55 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-23 16:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 16:56 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:00 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:02 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:12 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 00:47 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Barry Gray <barrygray@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 08:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 08:24 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-03-23 15:48 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-23 21:15 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 22:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:56 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-24 16:54 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-25 00:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 18:04 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:08 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 19:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:23 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:22 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:49 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 03:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 06:01 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 15:49 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 16:04 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 10:45 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:07 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:56 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 18:20 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:44 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 11:09 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 12:59 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 17:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-17 20:05 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 16:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-18 18:29 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:01 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-03-18 12:03 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Barry Allen (news)" <evanallen@onetel.net.uk.invalid> - 2012-03-18 13:55 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:57 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 21:09 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 15:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:28 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:20 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 13:43 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 15:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 20:13 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:43 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-10 23:53 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 16:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 17:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Sprow <news@sprow.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 23:38 -0800
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 14:25 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-06 14:40 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 16:47 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-02 00:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-02 10:12 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-03-02 20:14 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-02 23:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-03-03 19:29 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 21:37 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 22:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 22:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-04 08:16 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 13:15 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-03-05 20:36 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 22:30 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-03-03 22:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:08 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-09 01:58 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 14:57 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 19:19 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 20:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-03-03 22:25 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 12:58 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-03 17:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 20:07 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-04 14:11 +0000
Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Harriet Bazley <bazley@feathermail.co.uk> - 2012-03-04 11:04 +0000
Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-04 21:58 +0100
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-04 23:56 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Harriet Bazley <bazley@feathermail.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 01:00 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 13:02 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-06 15:52 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 11:37 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Chris Bell <news@highpath.net> - 2012-03-07 12:11 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-03-16 03:37 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Robin Hounsome <robin@hounsome.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 16:34 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-06 19:27 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 09:27 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-05 13:05 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-07 18:47 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> - 2012-03-08 10:19 +0000
Re: Iyonix startup "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-08-03 14:04 +0100
Re: Iyonix startup ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-08-03 22:34 +0100
Re: Iyonix startup (was Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Harriet Bazley <bazley@feathermail.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 21:32 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron <beeb@woosh.co.nz> - 2012-03-09 11:42 +1300
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:06 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Rob Hemmings (news2)" <robnews@rgvk.co.uk> - 2012-03-01 20:54 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-01 23:44 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-03 17:26 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-03 23:35 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-04 14:09 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-04 16:42 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-04 19:04 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-01 22:37 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! C J Craig <Chris@skipton.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-02 07:34 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ian Hamilton <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> - 2012-03-02 08:17 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! C J Craig <Chris@skipton.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-02 10:33 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ian Hamilton <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> - 2012-03-02 10:50 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-02 15:06 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-02 15:09 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-02 13:24 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:27 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-07 10:18 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-07 21:06 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 10:10 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> - 2012-03-03 17:24 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 20:01 +0100
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-03 20:35 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Ste (news)" <steve@revi11.plus.com> - 2012-03-04 01:43 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-04 11:47 +0000
Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:35 +0000
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
| From | Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-12 17:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <526f63d6fasee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4225 |
In article <526f5ba900tim@invalid.org.uk>, Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> wrote: > In article <526f332bfasee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>, > Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> > wrote: > > In article <526ef63b71ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk>, > > Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > In article > > > <526ef043e8see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>, Russell > > > Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote: > > > [Snip.] > > > > Documents that are given to customers are also all > > > > Easiwriter documents, and so are all my order > > > > forms. Some admin documents are done in Draw. > > > Are these printouts of EasiWriter documents > > Of course they are printouts. > > When you go into a hotel you hbd over a paper voucher, > > not show something on a computer screen. > Of course the 'modern' way to do it - on the hotel chain > websites and plane tickets - is to email a pdf file to a > customer and tell them to print it themselves and take > the printout with them. It is called passing the cost on to the customer. > Showing a barcode on the screen of a mobile phone has > been a standard for rail tickets since 2008. My local > operator - Chiltern Railways - even has several apps for > that. Again passing the cost onto the customer - and assumes that they have a mobile phone that can display the graphics. OK for simple journeys, not so good for a tickets from Cologne to Zagreb which has to specify three border crossing points and some intermediate routing too. -- Russell http://www.russell-hafter-holidays.co.uk Russell Hafter Holidays E-mail to enquiries at our domain Need a hotel? <http://www.hrs.com/?client=en__blue&customerId=416873103>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-13 07:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9s8abdFlmjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4234 |
On 12-Mar-2012, Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote: > In article <526f5ba900tim@invalid.org.uk>, Tim Hill > <tim@invalid.org.uk> wrote: > > > Of course the 'modern' way to do it - on the hotel chain > > websites and plane tickets - is to email a pdf file to a > > customer and tell them to print it themselves and take > > the printout with them. > > It is called passing the cost on to the customer. Don't be silly; the cost is *always* passed on to the customer. Who else do you think is going to pay? If a paper bill/voucher etc. is always sent then the costs are included in companies' overheads so the bills will be slightly higher. You just don't see it directly. Many utility companies now charge extra for paper bills, usually around 1.50 to 2 GBP per bill, which should give you some idea of the cost (remember there's postage too). I can download and print a PDF a LOT cheaper than that. -- David Holden - APDL - <http://www.apdl.co.uk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 05:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.4416801830063089826@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4246 |
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:12:45 GMT, "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> wrote: > Many utility companies now charge extra for paper bills, usually around 1.50 > to 2 GBP per bill, which should give you some idea of the cost No. It should give you an idea of how stupid people are. An electronic bill should be *cheaper*, not a paper bill being more *expensive*. The height of moronic behaviour, though, must go to Orange Mobile (France). I refuse to accept an electronic bill from them since they wanted a proper headed paper bill (and not a printout) for proof of address. When I renewed my contract, I took along their last statement. ;-) Anyway, they're pushing hard to get me to go to electronic...by writing a short grovel notice in really big text on an entirely separate piece of paper. Yay, there's intelligence for ya! Surely that could have been fit onto the bill itself someplace? Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 08:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9sb32kFnu5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4273 |
On 14-Mar-2012, Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:12:45 GMT, "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> > wrote: > > > Many utility companies now charge extra for paper bills, usually > around 1.50 to 2 GBP per bill, which should give you some idea of > the cost > > No. > It should give you an idea of how stupid people are. An electronic > bill should be *cheaper*, not a paper bill being more *expensive*. And the difference is? If item A is dearer than item B then surely item B is cheaper than item A, unless there's some sort of quantum maths involved. -- David Holden - APDL - <http://www.apdl.co.uk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 09:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ant140947868pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4275 |
In article <9sb32kFnu5U1@mid.individual.net>, David Holden <URL:mailto:SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> wrote: > > On 14-Mar-2012, Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:12:45 GMT, "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > > > Many utility companies now charge extra for paper bills, usually > > around 1.50 to 2 GBP per bill, which should give you some idea of > > the cost > > > > No. > > It should give you an idea of how stupid people are. An electronic > > bill should be *cheaper*, not a paper bill being more *expensive*. > > And the difference is? > > If item A is dearer than item B then surely item B is cheaper than item A, > unless there's some sort of quantum maths involved. It's all in the perception. "Special Offer", "Sale" even "Half Price" have no real meaning without knowing what you are comparing it to. Most humans are dumb! How often do you here "well they were on buy one get one free" Chris Evans -- CJE Micro's / 4D 'RISC OS Specialists' Telephone: 01903 523222 Fax: 01903 523679 chris@cjemicros.co.uk http://www.cjemicros.co.uk/ 78 Brighton Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 2EN The most beautiful thing anyone can wear, is a smile!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 11:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52704d9b2bsee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4279 |
In article <ant140947868pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>, Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote: > It's all in the perception. "Special Offer", "Sale" even > "Half Price" have no real meaning without knowing what > you are comparing it to. Certain firms are notorious for changing their sale terms from '50% Off' to 'Half Price'. -- Russell http://www.russell-hafter-holidays.co.uk Russell Hafter Holidays E-mail to enquiries at our domain Need a hotel? <http://www.hrs.com/?client=en__blue&customerId=416873103>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-17 20:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.6828310829386724165@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4279 |
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:49:47 +0000, Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote: > Most humans are dumb! How often do you here "well they were on buy one get > one free" That's dumb? I see paying for one and walking away with two... Dumb are people buying multipacks. Here in France it's the law to indicate prices for something by kilo/litre/unit (as appropriate). I've lost count of the number of times buying individual packs has worked out cheaper - especially with chocolate, of which I am very fond. :-) Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-17 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52720ce155Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4346 |
In article <almarsoft.6828310829386724165@news.orange.fr>, Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Dumb are people buying multipacks. Here in France it's the law to > indicate prices for something by kilo/litre/unit (as appropriate). > I've lost count of the number of times buying individual packs has > worked out cheaper - especially with chocolate, of which I am very > fond. :-) Here too in most supermarkets, on the price label on the shelf, you will see price per kilo/litre/unit, all it requires is to use eyes and engage brain. -- Stuart Winsor Only plain text for emails http://www.asciiribbon.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-17 22:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <527216155dspam-addy@no.spam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4349 |
In article <52720ce155Spambin@argonet.co.uk>, Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote: > In article <almarsoft.6828310829386724165@news.orange.fr>, Rick > Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Dumb are people buying multipacks. Here in France it's the law to > > indicate prices for something by kilo/litre/unit (as appropriate). > > I've lost count of the number of times buying individual packs has > > worked out cheaper - especially with chocolate, of which I am very > > fond. :-) > Here too in most supermarkets, on the price label on the shelf, you > will see price per kilo/litre/unit, all it requires is to use eyes > and engage brain. You certainly do need to engage your brains as (a) similar items (or same item, different weight packs) might well each be labelled as x pence per [weight] but the [weight] could be 100gm or 1 kg or 25 gm (or seemingly any random amount), and (b) the pence per weight doesn't always have much relation to the actual price. And then there's the Tesco scam which gives the price for the same item in other shops, showing what good value Tesco is, conveniently not mentioning that the slightly cheaper Tesco pack is 200 gm whilst the slightly more expensive Aldi pack is 250 gm. -- Dev Om Namah Shivaya | Om Avya-yaya namaha
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 00:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.3862963600053030936@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4352 |
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:54:41 +0000 (GMT), Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> wrote: > You certainly do need to engage your brains as (a) similar items (or > same item, different weight packs) might well each be labelled as x > pence per [weight] but the [weight] could be 100gm or 1 kg or 25 gm (or > seemingly any random amount), and (b) the pence per weight doesn't > always have much relation to the actual price. There's no law requiring standard weights? When I said in France the price was per kilo/litre/unit, I didn't mean "arbitrary weight/arbitrary volume/arbitrary object", I meant *exactly* what I said. Per litre (100cl), per kilo (1000g) or per unit (where the other two are illogical, such as "per toilet roll"). This permits easy comparison of "is this product a better price than the other"? This works, of course, purely on price. There are other factors. A ready meal by a company called "Marie" is quite proud of the fact that they use exactly what the pack implies. But it is twice the price of a store-brand equivalent which has a much longer list of ingredients containing such wonders as lecithin, potato starch, reformed soya pieces, acidity regulators, preservatives, etc etc. In one of my more enlightened moments, I bought both and ate them one after the other. The difference was akin to Grandma's beef stew and dumplings... vs Pot Noodle... Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 09:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52724fd1easpam-addy@no.spam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4357 |
In article <almarsoft.3862963600053030936@news.orange.fr>, Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:54:41 +0000 (GMT), Dev > <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> wrote: > > You certainly do need to engage your brains as (a) similar items (or > > same item, different weight packs) might well each be labelled as x > > pence per [weight] but the [weight] could be 100gm or 1 kg or 25 gm > (or > > seemingly any random amount), and (b) the pence per weight doesn't > > always have much relation to the actual price. > There's no law requiring standard weights? > When I said in France the price was per kilo/litre/unit, I didn't > mean "arbitrary weight/arbitrary volume/arbitrary object", I meant > *exactly* what I said. Per litre (100cl), per kilo (1000g) or per > unit (where the other two are illogical, such as "per toilet roll"). > This permits easy comparison of "is this product a better price than > the other"? Oh, yes. Say something like biscuits, purely for example, something which per unit weighs x gms for one brand and y gms for the other. Both come in packs of 9 (or other odd number) but one might be given as pence per 100 gm, but the other as pence per biscuit. More common is the same stuff in different weight packages where one is pence per kilogram and the otherpence per 100 gm (or 50 gm). > This works, of course, purely on price. > There are other factors. A ready meal by a company called "Marie" is > quite proud of the fact that they use exactly what the pack implies. > But it is twice the price of a store-brand equivalent which has a > much longer list of ingredients containing such wonders as lecithin, > potato starch, reformed soya pieces, acidity regulators, > preservatives, etc etc. > In one of my more enlightened moments, I bought both and ate them one > after the other. The difference was akin to Grandma's beef stew and > dumplings... vs Pot Noodle... Depends on yer grannie... ;-) -- Dev Om Namah Shivaya | Om Vishveshwa-raya namaha
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 15:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <527271d311Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4357 |
In article <almarsoft.3862963600053030936@news.orange.fr>, Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > There are other factors. A ready meal by a company called "Marie" is > quite proud of the fact that they use exactly what the pack implies. > But it is twice the price of a store-brand equivalent which has a > much longer list of ingredients containing such wonders as lecithin, > potato starch, reformed soya pieces, acidity regulators, > preservatives, etc etc. > In one of my more enlightened moments, I bought both and ate them one > after the other. The difference was akin to Grandma's beef stew and > dumplings... vs Pot Noodle... Ah yes. I was making myself a sandwich for my supper one evening and I had a fancy for lemon curd. Now, we hadn't got any and I hadn't had any for years, so I put it on the shopping list for my wife to get some. She does most of her shopping in Sainsbury's and came home with some Sainsbury's own, it was the most disgusting stuff ever. A few days later I was in Waitrose and spotted some Tiptree brand Lemon curd, obviously more expensive than the Sainsbury's, but I bought some, it was beautiful and tasted like what I had been imagining. Read down the ingredients on the Tiptree jar and it looked like a recipe you might find in Mrs Beaton, all good honest simple ingredients. Look at the ingredients on the Sainsbury's jar and it put me in mind of the lab sheets we used to get handed in chemistry lessons at school! -- Stuart Winsor Only plain text for emails http://www.asciiribbon.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 16:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5272734ad1UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4380 |
In article <527271d311Spambin@argonet.co.uk>, Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote: > Read down the ingredients on the Tiptree jar and it looked like a recipe > you might find in Mrs Beaton, all good honest simple ingredients. Look at > the ingredients on the Sainsbury's jar and it put me in mind of the lab > sheets we used to get handed in chemistry lessons at school! And does RISC OS do what it says on the tin? I'm keen to discuss recipes, ingredients etcetera - even dieting, my current pre-occupation for which I rely on the functionality of RISC OS - but what will the great Druck in the sky think? John -- John Williams, Brittany, Northern France - no attachments to these addresses! Non-RISC OS posters change user to johnrwilliams or put 'risc' in subject! Who is John Williams? http://petit.four.free.fr/picindex/author/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 16:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) |
| Message-ID | <71af777252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4381 |
On 18 Mar 2012 "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <527271d311Spambin@argonet.co.uk>,
> Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
>> Read down the ingredients on the Tiptree jar and it looked like a recipe
>> you might find in Mrs Beaton, all good honest simple ingredients. Look at
>> the ingredients on the Sainsbury's jar and it put me in mind of the lab
>> sheets we used to get handed in chemistry lessons at school!
> And does RISC OS do what it says on the tin?
> I'm keen to discuss recipes, ingredients etcetera - even dieting, my
> current pre-occupation for which I rely on the functionality of RISC OS -
> but what will the great Druck in the sky think?
I think marriage has mellowed him a bit. He has even been known to
post off-topic himself. How are the mighty fallen :-)
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / zfc Hf \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
and \/ __ __ \ England.
family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/ \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 17:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) |
| Message-ID | <5272791df8UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4382 |
In article <71af777252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote: > I think marriage has mellowed him a bit. He has even been known to > post off-topic himself. How are the mighty fallen :-) Please quote message IDs to use for the defence! John -- John Williams, Brittany, Northern France - no attachments to these addresses! Non-RISC OS posters change user to johnrwilliams or put 'risc' in subject! Who is John Williams? http://petit.four.free.fr/picindex/author/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 20:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) |
| Message-ID | <741a8b7252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4385 |
On 18 Mar 2012 "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <71af777252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>> I think marriage has mellowed him a bit. He has even been known to
>> post off-topic himself. How are the mighty fallen :-)
> Please quote message IDs to use for the defence!
Sorry, long since expired, but maybe I should have kept it!
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / zfc Hf \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
and \/ __ __ \ England.
family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/ \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung@ormail.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 21:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) |
| Message-ID | <62e78f7252.jess@itworkshop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #4398 |
In message <741a8b7252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2012 "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>> In article <71af777252.pnyoung@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
>> Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I think marriage has mellowed him a bit. He has even been known to
>>> post off-topic himself. How are the mighty fallen :-)
>> Please quote message IDs to use for the defence!
> Sorry, long since expired, but maybe I should have kept it!
Wasn't about a sports car?
--
Jess Iyonix
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-18 22:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) |
| Message-ID | <5272989ac4brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #4400 |
In article <62e78f7252.jess@itworkshop.invalid>, Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> wrote: [Snip] > Wasn't about a sports car? Look up "Manfred von Druck" AND "Fokker Triplane" in this ng. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. ______________________________________________________________________
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-19 11:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ant191137fc4pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #4346 |
In article <almarsoft.6828310829386724165@news.orange.fr>, Rick Murray <URL:mailto:heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:49:47 +0000, Chris Evans > <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote: > > > Most humans are dumb! How often do you here "well they were on buy > one get > > one free" > > That's dumb? I see paying for one and walking away with two... Yes but if the price had been jacked up.... It is the price paid for what you get that is key. > Dumb are people buying multipacks. Here in France it's the law to > indicate prices for something by kilo/litre/unit (as appropriate). > I've lost count of the number of times buying individual packs has > worked out cheaper - especially with chocolate, of which I am very > fond. :-) > > > Best wishes, > > Rick. > Chris Evans -- CJE Micro's / 4D 'RISC OS Specialists' Telephone: 01903 523222 Fax: 01903 523679 chris@cjemicros.co.uk http://www.cjemicros.co.uk/ 78 Brighton Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 2EN The most beautiful thing anyone can wear, is a smile!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-19 14:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.46817348622798593@news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #4425 |
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:07:37 +0000, Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote: >> That's dumb? I see paying for one and walking away with two... > Yes but if the price had been jacked up.... > It is the price paid for what you get that is key. Fair point. Over here, it is regulated by law that the price of something on offer must be not more than the price it was on general sale for X (six weeks? Something like that) exactly to stop this sort of practice. They're also starting to come down on those charging extra for a two year guarantee. It's some EU directive that stuff should come with such by standard... Best wishes, Rick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.misc
csiph-web