Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #21792 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-02-05 12:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-02-06 15:09 +0000 |
| Articles | 19 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc
RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-05 12:42 +0000
RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-05 16:13 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2026-02-06 18:05 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-06 20:29 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2026-02-07 11:40 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2026-02-07 12:01 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-07 15:54 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2026-02-11 00:34 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-11 09:11 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Martin <News04@avisoft.f9.co.uk> - 2026-02-11 09:38 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2026-02-12 09:12 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2026-02-13 18:31 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2026-02-11 21:21 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2026-02-11 21:43 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2026-02-13 18:21 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Jean-Michel <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> - 2026-02-06 10:11 +0100
Re: RO Pinboard problem Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2026-02-06 12:15 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2026-02-06 13:10 +0000
Re: RO Pinboard problem Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2026-02-06 15:09 +0000
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-05 12:42 +0000 |
| Subject | RO Pinboard problem |
| Message-ID | <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk> |
VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20 I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on. I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard Tasks.Obey file. "XPin HostFS::HardDisc4.$.filepathto.BP2602" plus co-ordinates on the desktop. But though it does present in the correct place on the pinboard/Desktop, the name is now "bp2602" not BP2602. The file will still run okay when 2/clicked on the Pinboard, by why is the system changing the name? (I need it to be specifically BP2602). If I change the actual file name to Bp2602 then it display on the pinboard as Bp2602. Thanks Dave -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-05 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca6750cf6dave@triffid.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21792 |
In article <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk>, Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20 > I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on. > I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard > Tasks.Obey file. > "XPin HostFS::HardDisc4.$.filepathto.BP2602" plus co-ordinates on the > desktop. > But though it does present in the correct place on the pinboard/Desktop, > the name is now "bp2602" not BP2602. > The file will still run okay when 2/clicked on the Pinboard, by why is > the system changing the name? (I need it to be specifically BP2602). > If I change the actual file name to Bp2602 then it display on the > pinboard as Bp2602. > Thanks > Dave Done a bit more work on this... If there are no numerics in the file name it displays on the pinboard okay, Eg: "BPForms". With regard to my requirements, It'll only behave if I add a lower case Alpha character after the BP thus: "BPx2602" Or a lower case Alpha character after the numerics thus: "BP2602z" What a load of ...... Thoughts... Thanks Dave -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 18:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <353003a75c.Paul@phorefaux> |
| In reply to | #21793 |
In message <5ca6750cf6dave@triffid.co.uk>
Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk>,
> Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
>> VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20
>> I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on.
>> I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard
>> Tasks.Obey file.
>> "XPin HostFS::HardDisc4.$.filepathto.BP2602" plus co-ordinates on the
>> desktop.
>> But though it does present in the correct place on the pinboard/Desktop,
>> the name is now "bp2602" not BP2602.
>> The file will still run okay when 2/clicked on the Pinboard, by why is
>> the system changing the name? (I need it to be specifically BP2602).
>> If I change the actual file name to Bp2602 then it display on the
>> pinboard as Bp2602.
>> Thanks
>> Dave
> Done a bit more work on this...
> If there are no numerics in the file name it displays on the pinboard
> okay, Eg: "BPForms".
> With regard to my requirements, It'll only behave if I add a lower case
> Alpha character after the BP thus:
> "BPx2602"
> Or a lower case Alpha character after the numerics thus:
> "BP2602z"
> What a load of ......
> Thoughts...
Okay. I have fired up my VRPC running 6.20 and I can replicate your
issue. I cannot replicated on my A9home running 4.42 due to not having
the same options.
Issue on RO6 would appear to be due to the "Object name display" setting
from within Configure-Pinboard-Interface. Under "Object name display"
there a setting: "Show all CAPS in lower case". When ticked this shows
the non numeric portion of the filename that are all in capitals as lower
case: -
BP2602 = bp2602
BPx2602 = BPx2602 (this displays correctly because the non
numeric part of the filename is is mixture of cases and not all
uppercase
BP6202z = BP6202z (works for same reason as above)
Hope this helps :)
--
Paul Stewart
Sent from A9home running RISC OS 4.42
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 20:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca71058a5dave@triffid.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21798 |
In article <353003a75c.Paul@phorefaux>, Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> wrote: > In message <5ca6750cf6dave@triffid.co.uk> > Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > > In article <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk>, > > Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > >> VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20 > >> I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on. > >> I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard > >> Tasks.Obey file. [Snip] > Okay. I have fired up my VRPC running 6.20 and I can replicate your > issue. I cannot replicated on my A9home running 4.42 due to not having > the same options. > Issue on RO6 would appear to be due to the "Object name display" setting > from within Configure-Pinboard-Interface. Under "Object name display" > there a setting: "Show all CAPS in lower case". When ticked this shows > the non numeric portion of the filename that are all in capitals as > lower case: - > BP2602 = bp2602 > BPx2602 = BPx2602 (this displays correctly because the non > numeric part of the filename is is mixture of cases and not all > uppercase > BP6202z = BP6202z (works for same reason as above) > Hope this helps :) Paul, Give that Man a score of Eleven out of Ten. An absolutely wonderful catch. That was indeed the problem, now fixed. Much appreciated, thanks Dave Nb: Interestingly, many previous experiments showed it was a RISC OS 6.20 problem, and that it didn't happen on any RISC OS 4.39 installs I tested. Nor even a RPCEmu and RISC OS 5.31. Neither RISC OS 4.39 or RISC OS 5.3nn have that Pinboard configure option. D. -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-07 11:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10m78b0$10df6$1@druck.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #21799 |
On 06/02/2026 20:29, Dave wrote: > Nb: Interestingly, many previous experiments showed it was a RISC OS 6.20 > problem, and that it didn't happen on any RISC OS 4.39 installs I tested. > > Nor even a RPCEmu and RISC OS 5.31. > > Neither RISC OS 4.39 or RISC OS 5.3nn have that Pinboard configure option. If people are reporting problems please give *important* details such as which OS and filing system you are using, and *note* that there is the built-in Pinboard and also Pinboard2. ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-07 12:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18a365a75c.Paul@phorefaux> |
| In reply to | #21800 |
In message <10m78b0$10df6$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 06/02/2026 20:29, Dave wrote:
>> Nb: Interestingly, many previous experiments showed it was a RISC OS 6.20
>> problem, and that it didn't happen on any RISC OS 4.39 installs I tested.
>>
>> Nor even a RPCEmu and RISC OS 5.31.
>>
>> Neither RISC OS 4.39 or RISC OS 5.3nn have that Pinboard configure option.
> If people are reporting problems please give *important* details such as
> which OS and filing system you are using, and *note* that there is the
> built-in Pinboard and also Pinboard2.
To be fair to Dave, he did state in his original post he was using VRPC
with RISC OS 6.20, also in his example he did indicate the filing system
was HostFS.
From the above details it wasn't too hard to understand which operating
system, filing system or product he was using it on.
He posted enough information for his issue to be resolved.
--
Paul Stewart
Sent from A9home running RISC OS 4.42
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-07 15:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca77b0ac3dave@triffid.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21800 |
In article <10m78b0$10df6$1@druck.eternal-september.org>, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: > On 06/02/2026 20:29, Dave wrote: > > Nb: Interestingly, many previous experiments showed it was a RISC OS > > 6.20 problem, and that it didn't happen on any RISC OS 4.39 installs I > > tested. > > > > Nor even a RPCEmu and RISC OS 5.31. > > > > Neither RISC OS 4.39 or RISC OS 5.3nn have that Pinboard configure > > option. > If people are reporting problems please give *important* details such as > which OS and filing system you are using, and *note* that there is the > built-in Pinboard and also Pinboard2. > ---druck Mnnn! Considering what my original posting contained, I'm not sure what I could have added? I didn't know of the existence of a Pinboard2... Guess that must be a RISC OS 5.nn thing which I don't use. Dave <Q> VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20 ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on. I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard Tasks.Obey file. "XPin HostFS::HardDisc4.$.filepathto.BP2602" plus co-ordinates on the desk. ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ </Q> D. -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-11 00:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10mgiqa$3ugv$1@druck.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #21802 |
On 07/02/2026 15:54, Dave wrote: > In article <10m78b0$10df6$1@druck.eternal-september.org>, > druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: >> If people are reporting problems please give *important* details such as >> which OS and filing system you are using, and *note* that there is the >> built-in Pinboard and also Pinboard2. > >> ---druck > > Mnnn! Considering what my original posting contained, I'm not sure what I > could have added? Sorry must have come in halfway through the thread. > I didn't know of the existence of a Pinboard2... Guess that must be a RISC > OS 5.nn thing which I don't use. Well at least you've learnt something! ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-11 09:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca9656675dave@triffid.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21803 |
In article <10mgiqa$3ugv$1@druck.eternal-september.org>, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: > On 07/02/2026 15:54, Dave wrote: > > In article <10m78b0$10df6$1@druck.eternal-september.org>, > > druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: > >> If people are reporting problems please give *important* details such > >> as which OS and filing system you are using, and *note* that there is > >> the built-in Pinboard and also Pinboard2. > > > >> ---druck > > > > Mnnn! Considering what my original posting contained, I'm not sure > > what I could have added? > Sorry must have come in halfway through the thread. > > I didn't know of the existence of a Pinboard2... Guess that must be a > > RISC OS 5.nn thing which I don't use. > Well at least you've learnt something! > ---druck Mmnn! That poses another question or maybe two. :-) I have a test setup of RISC OS 5.31 (March 25) on a RPCEmu install) What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard doesn't have? Is Pinboard2 in all newer versions of RISC OS 5.3nn? Thanks Dave -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin <News04@avisoft.f9.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-11 09:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca967e7aaNews04@avisoft.f9.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21804 |
In article <5ca9656675dave@triffid.co.uk>, Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > Mmnn! That poses another question or maybe two. :-) > I have a test setup of RISC OS 5.31 (March 25) on a RPCEmu install) > What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard > doesn't have? > Is Pinboard2 in all newer versions of RISC OS 5.3nn? See https://www.riscosdev.com/projects/pinboard-2/ -- Martin Avison Note that unfortunately this email address will become invalid without notice if (when) any spam is received.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-12 09:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca9e95c0adave@triffid.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #21805 |
In article <5ca967e7aaNews04@avisoft.f9.co.uk>, Martin <News04@avisoft.f9.co.uk> wrote: > In article <5ca9656675dave@triffid.co.uk>, > Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > > Mmnn! That poses another question or maybe two. :-) > > I have a test setup of RISC OS 5.31 (March 25) on a RPCEmu install) > > What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard > > doesn't have? > > Is Pinboard2 in all newer versions of RISC OS 5.3nn? > See https://www.riscosdev.com/projects/pinboard-2/ Thanks for the link Martin, Looks interesting and I've downloaded it, and though I'm very busy ATM, later when I'm done with a particular job I'm in the middle of, I'll try it out on some of my Test RISC OS installs. Regards Dave -- Dave Triffid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-13 18:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7a64a0aa5c.Paul@phorefaux> |
| In reply to | #21805 |
In message <5ca967e7aaNews04@avisoft.f9.co.uk>
Martin <News04@avisoft.f9.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <5ca9656675dave@triffid.co.uk>,
> Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
>> Mmnn! That poses another question or maybe two. :-)
>> I have a test setup of RISC OS 5.31 (March 25) on a RPCEmu install)
>> What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard
>> doesn't have?
>> Is Pinboard2 in all newer versions of RISC OS 5.3nn?
> See https://www.riscosdev.com/projects/pinboard-2/
Thanks for the above link Martin.
Looking at the site, I did not realise it worked with RISC OS versions,
other than 5. Have downloaded to test on my A9home.
Couple of points to note:
1. The supplied Install obey file, does not work, generated file not found
error. I believe this is due it looking for and not finding RO500Hook.
2. Can be installed by merging the !Boot, but the Pinboard 2 Configure app
does did not load, this is due to it being supplied in RO500Hook. Just
manually moved it into RO440Hook, and then worked as expected.
Essentially the Install obey file could do with some improvements.
Following a reboot, it was up and running. Just need to explore it now :)
--
Paul Stewart
Sent from A9home running RISC OS 4.42
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-11 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10mirso$uecd$1@druck.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #21804 |
On 11/02/2026 09:11, Dave wrote: > What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard doesn't > have? I've only got it on my mini.m test machine, but it seems every time I VNC in to it I accidentally click on the pinboard and hide all the open windows. The only way I've found to unhide them is to use it's menu to hide and then restore. I looked for some configuration to turn this off, but didn't find any. The website doesn't have a link to documentation, as is standard for ROD products. ---druck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-11 21:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a955aaa95c.chris@mytardis> |
| In reply to | #21806 |
In message <10mirso$uecd$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 11/02/2026 09:11, Dave wrote:
>> What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard doesn't
>> have?
> I've only got it on my mini.m test machine, but it seems every time I
> VNC in to it I accidentally click on the pinboard and hide all the open
> windows. The only way I've found to unhide them is to use it's menu to
> hide and then restore. I looked for some configuration to turn this off,
> but didn't find any. The website doesn't have a link to documentation,
> as is standard for ROD products.
Goto the Pinboard Configure setup via menu on the pinboard, then
Miscellaneous section second option down sounds like what you are wanting
unticked.
--
Chris Hughes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-13 18:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7c6f9faa5c.Paul@phorefaux> |
| In reply to | #21806 |
In message <10mirso$uecd$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> On 11/02/2026 09:11, Dave wrote:
>> What does Pinboard2 have that the bog standard RISC OS Pinboard doesn't
>> have?
> I've only got it on my mini.m test machine, but it seems every time I
> VNC in to it I accidentally click on the pinboard and hide all the open
> windows. The only way I've found to unhide them is to use it's menu to
> hide and then restore. I looked for some configuration to turn this off,
> but didn't find any. The website doesn't have a link to documentation,
> as is standard for ROD products.
The website itself may not have links to documentation, but the download
contains a 55 page manual.
--
Paul Stewart
Sent from A9home running RISC OS 4.42
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jean-Michel <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 10:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dc47d2a65c.jmb@jmc.bruck.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #21792 |
In message <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk>
Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote:
> VRPC-DL RISC OS 6.20
> I have a Pinboard problem and wondered what's going on.
> I have a file called "BP2602" and a reference to it in the Pinboard
> Tasks.Obey file.
> "XPin HostFS::HardDisc4.$.filepathto.BP2602" plus co-ordinates on the
> desktop.
> But though it does present in the correct place on the pinboard/Desktop,
> the name is now "bp2602" not BP2602.
> The file will still run okay when 2/clicked on the Pinboard, by why is the
> system changing the name? (I need it to be specifically BP2602).
> If I change the actual file name to Bp2602 then it display on the pinboard
> as Bp2602.
> Thanks
> Dave
Hi,
If I create an "EXAMPLE" directory pinboard changes it to "Example". We
can rename it but then Pinboard crashes...
When restarting, the name change was taken into account!!!
--
Jean-Michel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 12:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca6e31981basura@invalid.addr.uk> |
| In reply to | #21794 |
In article <dc47d2a65c.jmb@jmc.bruck.orange.fr>, Jean-Michel <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> wrote: > In message <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk> Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> > wrote: > Hi, If I create an "EXAMPLE" directory pinboard changes it to > "Example". We can rename it but then Pinboard crashes... When > restarting, the name change was taken into account!!! So it does - crash occurs with a file or a directory. The new name is reflected correctly on the SSD after a reboot. Looks like a bug. I haven't gone through Dave's example but from what he's reporting is this another bug? Using Pinboard 2.07 Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 13:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <202be8a65c.chris@mytardis> |
| In reply to | #21795 |
In message <5ca6e31981basura@invalid.addr.uk>
Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> wrote:
> In article <dc47d2a65c.jmb@jmc.bruck.orange.fr>, Jean-Michel
> <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> wrote:
>> In message <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk> Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> Hi, If I create an "EXAMPLE" directory pinboard changes it to
>> "Example". We can rename it but then Pinboard crashes... When
>> restarting, the name change was taken into account!!!
> So it does - crash occurs with a file or a directory. The new name is
> reflected correctly on the SSD after a reboot. Looks like a bug. I
> haven't gone through Dave's example but from what he's reporting is
> this another bug?
> Using Pinboard 2.07
I assume Richard you are using Pinboard 2 from ROD, whereas I think Dave
is using the standard Pinboard from RISC OS 6.20.
Two completely different beasts
--
Chris Hughes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-06 15:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5ca6f310bdbasura@invalid.addr.uk> |
| In reply to | #21796 |
In article <202be8a65c.chris@mytardis>, Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote: > In message <5ca6e31981basura@invalid.addr.uk> Richard Ashbery > <basura@invalid.addr.uk> wrote: > > In article <dc47d2a65c.jmb@jmc.bruck.orange.fr>, Jean-Michel > > <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> wrote: > >> In message <5ca661bd9adave@triffid.co.uk> Dave > >> <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hi, If I create an "EXAMPLE" directory pinboard changes it to > >> "Example". We can rename it but then Pinboard crashes... When > >> restarting, the name change was taken into account!!! > > So it does - crash occurs with a file or a directory. The new > > name is reflected correctly on the SSD after a reboot. Looks like > > a bug. I haven't gone through Dave's example but from what he's > > reporting is this another bug? > > Using Pinboard 2.07 > I assume Richard you are using Pinboard 2 from ROD, whereas I think > Dave is using the standard Pinboard from RISC OS 6.20. That's correct Chris, Pinboard 2 from ROD, V2.07. > Two completely different beasts I was actually replying to Jean-Michel's posting. Richards
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.misc
csiph-web