Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.hardware > #7657
| From | Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| References | (1 earlier) <f18bffe65b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> <5be73df3f3Spambin@argonet.co.uk> <9d3a80e75b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> <5be7878afcSpambin@argonet.co.uk> <a4d188e75b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> |
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-Id | <5be7e67eb8Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: SSd or spinning rust |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.hardware |
| Date | 2025-01-31 15:45 +0000 |
In article <a4d188e75b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>, David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote: > ... because, when you backed up to the PC, "RISCOS filetypes are > destroyed". So I'm offering you something that will back up to, and > restore from, a PC while keeping the file types etc. prefectly intact. Let me explain. Backing up and retrieving from my NAS is not a problem, but, periodically, I back up my NAS to an NTFS format portable drive, via my PC. It is those backups when the RISCOS file types get screwed. What I intend to do is to get a 256G SSD or HDD, formatted to RISCOS format and back up to that, avoiding windows getting involved at all. So, the question is SSD or spinning rust, which is better for long time storage, bearing in mind a S.R. drive would require more power, hence an additional external PSU, whereas an SSD would probably be Ok on the USB3 port of my Ra-Pi. Yes I'm aware RISCOS cannot make use of USB3 speed, but the port is capable of supplying higher power than the USB2 of my ARMX6. -- Stuart Winsor Tools With A Mission sending tools across the world http://www.twam.co.uk/
Back to comp.sys.acorn.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Stuart.winsor@orpheusinternet.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 20:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Sniffer <sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 20:24 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:30 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2025-01-30 10:20 +0100
Re: SSd or spinning rust Sniffer <sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:34 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:29 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-02-03 21:14 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-02-04 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:35 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-30 21:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 22:30 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-30 22:34 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-31 15:45 +0000
csiph-web