Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.hardware > #7648
| Message-Id | <5be6fe691fSpambin@argonet.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 21:30 +0000 |
| From | Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: SSd or spinning rust |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.hardware |
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| References | <5be6f6d18dStuart.winsor@orpheusinternet.co.uk> <vne2p3$2c51h$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <vne2p3$2c51h$1@dont-email.me>, Sniffer <sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk> wrote: > On 29/01/2025 20:00, Stuart wrote: > > Although I have a NAS, I am looking at additional back-up facilities > > for all my RISCOS stuff. Whilst I can copy my RISCOs stuff, along with > > all the PC stuff, from the NAS to a large portable drive connected to > > my PC, RISCOS filetypes are destroyed. I would, therefore, like to > > attach a large external drive to my Ra-Pi, and copy on to that. > > > > Now, I can buy a re-certified 3.5" 256G WD Caviar Blue, from CPC for > > £10.49, or, A 2.5" Crucial MX500 250G SSD for £28.32 from the same > > company. > > > > The question is, which to go for? > > > IMHO, SSD everytime. Don't forget to backup your backups though! That is effectively what I am doing. The back-ups I have on the NAS, being backed up to a portable drive. As well as the NAS, everything I do on the Ra-Pi is also copied across to my ARMX6, ARMBook, and Kinetic. Similarly with stuff created on the Kinetic and ARMX6. I am inclined to go with you because an SSD would not require additional power whereas a spinning rust drive would. > By the way, 500GB Crucial SSD for same price on Amazon. Thanks but I try to avoid Amazon if I can, it's all too easy to find I have signed up to Prime. CPC is an outfit I use quite a bit and, although it wouldn't apply in this case, I can always find additional components to exceed the £20 minimum order to get free postage. Stuart. -- Stuart Winsor Tools With A Mission sending tools across the world http://www.twam.co.uk/
Back to comp.sys.acorn.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Stuart.winsor@orpheusinternet.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 20:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Sniffer <sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 20:24 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:30 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2025-01-30 10:20 +0100
Re: SSd or spinning rust Sniffer <sniffer@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:34 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:29 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-02-03 21:14 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-02-04 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-29 21:35 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 09:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-30 21:00 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-30 22:30 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2025-01-30 22:34 +0000
Re: SSd or spinning rust Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2025-01-31 15:45 +0000
csiph-web