Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? |
| Date | 2012-08-20 17:04 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <503251F7.6020103@loria.fr> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <slrn3vfsk32o91.221.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> <fdc7ea7c-759a-4300-b396-36aad059fb58@googlegroups.com> <slrn3vfsk33kev.7o1.ike@sverige.freeshell.org> <61359da1-45c2-45cb-afac-1860d957ae79@googlegroups.com> <slrn3vfsk34ba2.cu6.ike@sverige.freeshell.org> |
Am 20.08.2012 14:27, schrieb Ike Naar:
> On 2012-08-20, Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> wrote:
>> I do not like answers that starts with "I think' (without any offence).
>> You think such a way others think aother way. Do we deal with a standard or not?
>> Well, let change the original example the following way
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int a[];
>>
>> int main( void )
>> {
>> printf( "sizeof( a ) = %ul\n", sizeof( a ) );
>
> Nit: the format specifier to print an unsigned long is
> "%lu", not "%ul". "%ul" will print an unsigned int, followed
> by the letter "l".
Nit for nit, sizeof is of type size_t and the correct format for that is
%zu and not %lu
Jens
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-19 13:40 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-19 14:06 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-19 14:30 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-08-19 21:56 +0000
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-19 16:42 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-19 19:22 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Wojtek Lerch <wojtek_l@yahoo.ca> - 2012-08-20 10:57 -0400
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-20 13:01 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Wojtek Lerch <wojtek_l@yahoo.ca> - 2012-08-20 16:58 -0400
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-08-21 00:44 +0000
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-08-20 05:57 +0000
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-20 03:22 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-08-20 12:27 +0000
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-20 17:04 +0200
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-08-20 16:35 +0000
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-20 20:43 +0200
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-20 08:46 -0400
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-19 14:24 -0700
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? "Ersek, Laszlo" <lacos@caesar.elte.hu> - 2012-08-19 23:36 +0200
Re: When is the complete type of an external definition known? Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> - 2012-08-19 14:46 -0700
csiph-web