Re: Testing ALL Windows browsers on one machine

X-Received	by 10.224.53.198 with SMTP id n6mr14072390qag.2.1369737774333; Tue, 28 May 2013 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received	by 10.50.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr1218709igb.2.1369737774294; Tue, 28 May 2013 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!p1no1196125qaj.0!news-out.google.com!y6ni51517qax.0!nntp.google.com!ch1no2579120qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.software.testing
Date	Tue, 28 May 2013 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<jimbones-1301991319050001@go3.webivore.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.173.165.177; posting-account=Fg6EyQoAAADaIS6UQJ2AX0LarmrdQ-mt
NNTP-Posting-Host	122.173.165.177
References	<jimbones-1301991319050001@go3.webivore.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<5c776174-8b00-4a67-bf38-d3408b262e7b@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Testing ALL Windows browsers on one machine
From	aaratrikasharma2@gmail.com
Injection-Date	Tue, 28 May 2013 10:42:54 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref	csiph.com comp.software.testing:296

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wednesday, January 13, 1999 1:30:00 PM UTC+5:30, Jim Gouldstone wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I am developing a website which uses javascript, java, and browser plugins
> extensively.
> 
> Despite specifications, the NUMEROUS browsers always find ways of not
> working as expected, so I'd like to test with and accommodate as many
> browsers as is possible.
> 
> Problem is,
> IE 3.0, 3.01, 3.02, 4.0, etc all have their nuances.
> As do NN 3.0, 3.01, 3.01 Gold, 3.04 etc.
> 
> AFAIK, I cannot install many of these simiulatneously on the same
> machine.  They either replace one another, update files which other
> versions use, and generally 'pollute' the system.  I prefer not to keep
> installing and uninstalling versions of browsers which cannot co-exist
> because:
> 
>   a.  I want to do 'clean' installs of the various versions.  (i.e. I
> don't want previous installations of other versions to affect how the
> present one works.)
> 
>   b.  It's annoying.
> 
> 
> I'd also prefer not to keep blanking the harddrive and reinstalling the OS
> and browser.
> 
> A row of 'clean' testing machines each with very subtle browser
> differences doesn't make much sense to me, cashwise.
> 
> 
> So the plan is to get one of these new 250M zip drives, set up a machine
> which can boot from a SCSI device (i.e. the 250M zip drive), and just have
> a stack of zip disks each with Win 95, NT, or 98 on them and one or two
> coexistable? browsers installed.  Then I can boot into one of many testing
> environments on one machine.
> 
> (I prefer this to something like 'Partition Magic' because I can add an
> unlimited number of new OS/browser combinations this way.  And this just
> seems to be a clean way of doing things.)
> 
> 
> The above is a semi-informed idea and I'm simply inviting comments or
> suggestions from people who know more about it than I.
> 
> I haven't found much info on how people manage to test on the many
> different browsers simply and economically, but that could just be that
> I'm not up on the testing lingo.
> 
> Thanks for any advice!
> 
> wahey wahey
> 
> jimbones
> 
> Please reply by email, too!

Thanks for share the post
http://goo.gl/UQRhX | http://goo.gl/dnsXJ | http://goo.gl/TyH9E

Back to comp.software.testing | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Testing ALL Windows browsers on one machine aaratrikasharma2@gmail.com - 2013-05-28 03:42 -0700
  Re: Testing ALL Windows browsers on one machine ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2013-05-29 12:45 -0500

csiph-web