Re: wxwidgets-linux: wxString

Newsgroups	comp.soft-sys.wxwindows
From	Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org>
Subject	Re: wxwidgets-linux: wxString
References	<5274ea5e$0$2356$91cee783@newsreader04.highway.telekom.at> <slrnl7gf48.io5.vadim@sunset.tt-solutions.com> <52790b49$0$12676$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at>
Message-ID	<slrnl8595d.a9l.vadim@sunset.tt-solutions.com> (permalink)
Date	2013-11-12 21:59 +0000
Organization	Guest of ProXad - France

Show all headers | View raw

On 2013-11-05, Peter Johann Brunner <pjbru@aon.at> wrote:
> thank you for your prompt answer.
>
> as i wrote, the installations of wx... are identcal, not self built,
> from OPenSuse, same lib-names in /usr/lib64/:
> 	wx-2.8-stl/libwx_baseu-2.8.so
> 	...
> 	wx-2.8-stl/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so
> 	...
> 	wx-2.8-wxcontainer/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so
> 	etc.
> seems to be a unicode build?!

 Yes, both are built in Unicode mode.

> BUT:
> on both computers i tried a self built version with gtk1 !

 Well, don't. This version is not supported any more, so you are really
just looking for problems if you use it.

 But in any case, this doesn't explain the differences you described in
your initial post, GTK1 or not ANSI vs Unicode remains the same.

 Regards,
VZ

-- 
TT-Solutions: wxWidgets consultancy and technical support
              http://www.tt-solutions.com/

Back to comp.soft-sys.wxwindows | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

wxwidgets-linux: wxString Peter Johann Brunner <pjbru@aon.at> - 2013-11-02 13:04 +0100
  Re: wxwidgets-linux: wxString Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org> - 2013-11-05 00:32 +0000
    Re: wxwidgets-linux: wxString Peter Johann Brunner <pjbru@aon.at> - 2013-11-05 16:14 +0100
      Re: wxwidgets-linux: wxString Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org> - 2013-11-12 21:59 +0000

csiph-web