Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16831

Re: complex conjugation by star

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!newspump.sol.net!post2.nntp.sol.net!posts.news.twtelecom.net!nnrp3.twtelecom.net!not-for-mail
From "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm@KevinMcCann.com>
Newsgroups comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject Re: complex conjugation by star
Date Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
Sender steve@smc.vnet.net
Approved Steven M. Christensen <steve@smc.vnet.net>, Moderator
Message-ID <lj2nb7$6ds$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)
References <20140418054638.0964A6A15@smc.vnet.net> <lj01jl$s5h$1@smc.vnet.net>
Lines 62
Organization Time-Warner Telecom
NNTP-Posting-Date 21 Apr 2014 09:17:10 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host 00516bb2.news.twtelecom.net
X-Trace DXC=aQ[CD]llnf[144X5D4^0KSC_A=>8kQj6];[h;PUXBgbT3`G[5H2>>MREFiONJ7[GoVLhn`0d5_I:[
X-Complaints-To abuse@twtelecom.net
Xref csiph.com comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica:16831

Show key headers only | View raw


I have used the following for many years

Clear[x, aaa, bbb]
SuperStar[x_] := x /. Complex[aaa_, bbb_] -> Complex[aaa, -bbb]

(The SuperStar[x_] translates to x_^*)

No problems. Also, no highlighted asterisk.

Kevin


On 4/20/2014 4:47 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> I don't see how your definition can be valid. When I type input
>
>    f_*:=f/.Complex[u_,v_]->Complex[u,-v]
>
> I see a highlighted asterisk, indicating a syntax error.
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2014, at 1:46 AM, Brambilla Roberto Luigi (RSE) <Roberto.Brambilla@rse-web.it> wrote:
>
>> I have defined the following useful star complex-conjugation (common star exponent notation)
>>
>>    f_*:=f/.Complex[u_,v_]->Complex[u,-v]
>>
>> and it works fine. For example BesselJ[2,x+I y]* gives BesselJ[2,x-I y]  etc...(x,y defined/undefined).
>> Also it is listable on number lists
>>
>> {1+i2, 5+i6}*  gives  {1-i2, 5-i6} .
>>
>> Unfortunately it does not work on symbols, i.e.
>> A* gives A even if I have defined A as a complex number by means of Element[A, Complexes].
>> Similarly if I define Element[{A,B,G}, Complexes]
>>
>> {A,B,G}* gives {A,B,G}  and (A+B+G)*  gives A+B+G.
>>
>> I'd like to obtain {A*,B*,G*} and A*+B*+G*    ( ! )
>>
>> Is it possible to fix this deficiency, unpleasant in manipulating general expressions where is not known
>> if symbols represent real or complex variables ?
>>
>> Many thanks!
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Murray Eisenberg                                murray@math.umass.edu
> Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
> Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 240 246-7240 (H)
> University of Massachusetts
> 710 North Pleasant Street
> Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: complex conjugation by star Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu> - 2014-04-20 08:47 +0000
  Re: complex conjugation by star "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm@KevinMcCann.com> - 2014-04-21 09:11 +0000

csiph-web