Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16591
| From | Daniel Stariolo <daniel.stariolo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Some linear constraints seem to be ignored in function |
| Date | 2014-03-02 06:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <leuiue$sd7$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20140222080533.BDB3B6A13@smc.vnet.net> <lec8vh$l39$1@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
Bob, thank you very much for your help. Indeed, changing the Method allows to get some improvement. Nevertheless stochastic methods like DifferentialEvolution or SimulatedAnnealing make a random walk on parameter space and when the excursion goes out of bounds the search stops with the message on the complex value of the logarithm. Then, you get a poor result, generally even far from a local minimum. A satisfactory workaround for the out of bounds problem that seems to work very well was proposed in this link "http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/42999/nminimize-go-out-of-bounds-on-some-linear-constraints" by Daniel Lichtblau.
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Some linear constraints seem to be ignored in function Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 07:45 +0000 Re: Some linear constraints seem to be ignored in function Daniel Stariolo <daniel.stariolo@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 06:26 +0000
csiph-web