Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.maple > #808
| From | Herman Rubin <hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.maple |
| Subject | Re: Approximating the sum of a series |
| Date | 2013-07-25 23:37 +0000 |
| Organization | Purdue University Statistics Department |
| Message-ID | <slrnkv3e1p.s7d.hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu> (permalink) |
| References | <96195d9d-cdfd-4850-a75b-05e368c4db94@googlegroups.com> <bb9dfff8-cc30-48fd-8c75-02c2f5c7d10e@googlegroups.com> <b586ekF9189U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 2013-07-23, Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> wrote: > On 23.07.2013 21:29, mmatica@personal.ro wrote: >> The problem is not related to the exact sum of the series >> but about the possibility to approximate such series (directly) in Maple. >> (there should be some flags/options). >> BTW, Borwein & Borwein have proved that >> 1/10^5*sum(exp(-n^2/(10^10)),n=-infinity..infinity) >> = sqrt(Pi) + e >> 0< |e| < 10^(-42000000000) > Ok, I am not Borwein^2 and assuming their result the suggested > formula can not be correct (BTW: the assumptions for AbelPlana > are not satisfied). > For the numerical question I would guess: something similar to > slowly convergent integrals happens and Maple's accellerators > can not handle it (not even in high precision), exp(-10^5) is > too 'close' to one (for larger n). The Borwein result follow from the Jacobi inversion formula for a sum of a periodic series. If f(x) = \sum g(x+n) where the sum is from -infinity to infinity, then the periodic function is given by f(x) = \sum c_k * exp(2*\pi*i*k*x), where c_k = \int exp(-2*\pi*i*k*t)*g(t) dt, the integral going from -infinity to infinity. This cannot be used in all situations, but for \sum exp(-h*(n+x)^2) one of the series convergers rapidly. However, this would not be helpful in many other cases. Both for sums and integrals, Maple makes a few tries and then gives up if things do not look like the function is well-behaved, whereas a better lookahead would find that it is well-behaved after an allowable number of terms or other device. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.maple | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Approximating the sum of a series mmatica@personal.ro - 2013-07-23 00:48 -0700
Re: Approximating the sum of a series "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2013-07-23 07:17 -0500
Re: Approximating the sum of a series acer <maple@rogers.com> - 2013-07-23 07:01 -0700
Re: Approximating the sum of a series Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2013-07-23 18:57 +0200
Re: Approximating the sum of a series mmatica@personal.ro - 2013-07-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Approximating the sum of a series mmatica@personal.ro - 2013-07-23 12:29 -0700
Re: Approximating the sum of a series Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2013-07-23 22:11 +0200
Re: Approximating the sum of a series mmatica@personal.ro - 2013-07-23 14:08 -0700
Re: Approximating the sum of a series Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2013-07-28 19:40 +0200
Re: Approximating the sum of a series / an Integral Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2013-07-29 22:22 +0200
Re: Approximating the sum of a series / an Integral Herman Rubin <hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu> - 2013-07-30 18:03 +0000
Re: Approximating the sum of a series Herman Rubin <hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu> - 2013-07-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Approximating the sum of a series acer <maple@rogers.com> - 2013-07-23 14:02 -0700
csiph-web