Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.maple > #266
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.maple |
| Subject | Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! |
| Date | Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:32:56 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 11 |
| Message-ID | <87aa76iogn.fsf@san.rr.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0db37bbb-8efc-409c-aa16-338c77d6b556@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <87ipluj300.fsf@san.rr.com> <4a975346-0ef2-4730-a961-99fc93ca732d@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <87ehwiivy4.fsf@san.rr.com> <4917a14d-b181-4f69-839a-6e810dc5065f@t16g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <def677a0-79b2-46fa-854c-82e212acd503@i8g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <9c420de6-d6d1-46bd-af72-0402a0d9c123@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fkgjSOZ+03w83W7QjZBmIg"; logging-data="18744"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cW6l+3fR8mCcJQ6rg1aOE" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:yHx1GMGJdpm+mICM3OJLj4icEaY= sha1:gUE+PjxXwSSkIvKt5f6+gvnMdLI= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.soft-sys.math.maple:266 |
Show key headers only | View raw
jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> writes:
>> Try plot('f2(2^(-a))', a=1..56);
>
> I didn't notice those two apostrophes earlier - this does work a *lot*
> better! So far so good...
You will have to increase Digits to get to 256.
--
Joe Riel
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.maple | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 09:09 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> - 2011-12-05 10:18 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 12:08 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> - 2011-12-05 12:51 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 13:28 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 13:46 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 14:43 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> - 2011-12-05 15:32 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! jdm <james.d.mclaughlin@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 16:04 -0800
Re: Inverse CDF of standard normal is (according to Maple 15) complex valued for some positive inputs! Herman Rubin <hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu> - 2011-12-07 02:06 +0000
csiph-web