Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.security.misc > #1155
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.security.misc |
| Subject | Re: Coded sentences |
| Date | 2016-04-08 01:30 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ne71jo$704$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ne6gbu$vji$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 2016-04-07, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote: > > A codebook in classical crypto is a mapping from a chosen number of > normal or nonsense words to the corresponding intended words or even > phrases and sentences. Wouldn't a generalization of that idea, namely a > mapping from certain types of sentences to the corresponding intended > phrases or sentences be much more versatile and useful in practice for > purposes of steganographical transmission of secret messages? I mean > e.g. a rather mundane sentence expressing the fact that some friends > came to visit us and we have together done something and that they'll > further travel to somewhere could be written in a quite large number of > different ways textually via varying the names of the visitors and what > we have jointly done etc. as well as via varying the grammatical > constructions of the sentence. If you have 5 words you want to transmit, OK. If you want to encrypt 10^9 bytes, it is hopeless. Languages are pretty well structured, and meaning is also well structured. It is really hard to tell a computer how to manufacture plausible and meaningful text. So no, it would not be more versatile and useful. > > M. K. Shen
Back to comp.security.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-07 22:36 +0200
Re: Coded sentences William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-08 01:30 +0000
Re: Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-08 23:14 +0200
Re: Coded sentences William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-08 22:44 +0000
Re: Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-09 19:54 +0200
Re: Coded sentences William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-09 20:21 +0000
Re: Coded sentences Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2016-04-09 16:31 -0400
Re: Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-10 23:09 +0200
Re: Coded sentences William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-10 21:28 +0000
Re: Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-11 22:39 +0200
Re: Coded sentences William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-11 21:47 +0000
Re: Coded sentences Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2016-04-12 21:55 +0200
csiph-web