Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15796 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vom513 <vom513@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-05-30 23:58 -0400 |
| Last post | 2020-05-30 23:58 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Constant errors concerning in-addr.arpa SOA (insecure response) vom513 <vom513@gmail.com> - 2020-05-30 23:58 -0400
| From | vom513 <vom513@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-30 23:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Constant errors concerning in-addr.arpa SOA (insecure response) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.463.1590897482.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> |
Sorry to self reply - I *think* I figured this out. Looks like the messages I was seeing (at least to my eyes) make this seem like a true failure in the chain of recursion/validation. Looks like it’s more benign - misconfigured auth servers for various in-addr.arpa zones hading out information erroneously (i.e. NOT what they were asked / have been delegated).
I was able to do this on one of my “clean” servers that I hadn’t observed the log messages on:
while true; do nmap -n -iR 10 -sL | grep "^Nmap scan" | awk '{print $5}' | while read ip; do dig -x $ip; done; sleep 5; done
I’m just using nmap to generate 10 random IPs, I’m not “scanning” anything…
That command managed to trigger the log message on my “clean” machine. I think part of the issue is my mail server is simply much busier looking up rDNS as it gets SMTP connections, and is therefore more likely to trigger this log.
I don’t mean to pick on this network, but the following record/query seems to trigger this every time:
dig -x 106.62.177.136
And to see what caused it:
dig +trace -x 106.62.177.136
Notice the “IN-ADDR.ARPA” they give out (helpfully in all CAPS :)).
Sorry for the noise with this thread. If anyone has a more in-depth explanation of bind’s behavior in this scenario I’d love to hear it because I don’t feel like I 100% understand it...
Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind
csiph-web