Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15740 > unrolled thread

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

Started byGrant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
First post2020-05-06 22:46 -0600
Last post2020-05-06 22:46 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-06 22:46 -0600

#15740 — Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

FromGrant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Date2020-05-06 22:46 -0600
SubjectRe: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?
Message-ID<mailman.374.1588826765.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 5/6/20 6:56 PM, John Levine wrote:
> Oh, in that case, why don't you just put some adjusted NS entries in 
> your stub .net zone pointing at your internal name servers?  Seems a 
> lot easier than fooling around with routing.

Because that is a hack at best.

I figured that there was something I was missing that didn't require 
anycast for proper delegation.  But I'm not seeing anything else.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind


csiph-web