Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15731 > unrolled thread

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

Started byGrant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
First post2020-05-06 14:29 -0600
Last post2020-05-06 17:38 -0400
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-06 14:29 -0600
    Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-05-06 17:38 -0400

#15731 — Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

FromGrant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Date2020-05-06 14:29 -0600
SubjectRe: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?
Message-ID<mailman.364.1588797009.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 5/6/20 2:21 PM, John Levine wrote:
> Don't Do That.

That's one of the hard requirements of what I'm doing.  Not doing that 
is not an option.

> This really seems like ordinary split horizon DNS.

Please explain what you mean by "split horizon DNS" like I'm a n00b, 
because obviously my understanding of it differs from what your 
understanding seems to be.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#15733

From"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Date2020-05-06 17:38 -0400
Message-ID<mailman.367.1588801131.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>
In reply to#15731
In article <mailman.364.1588797009.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> you write:
>> This really seems like ordinary split horizon DNS.
>
>Please explain what you mean by "split horizon DNS" like I'm a n00b, 
>because obviously my understanding of it differs from what your 
>understanding seems to be.

The DNS server sends different answers depending on the client IP, so
on your internal network it sees the private subdomain, everywhere
else sees a ENT or NXDOMAIN.

If you really have to use physically separate servers for reasons that
you can't explain, I suppose putting the two servers at the same IP
addresss facing different networks could work, although you're asking
for trouble with route leaks anytime someone adjusts a router anywhere
near one or the other.  Remember that with normal anycast all of the
mirrors send identical or at least equivalent answers so the routes
are not a security issue.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind


csiph-web