Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15717 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-05-02 21:35 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-05-02 21:35 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-05-02 21:35 +0200
| From | Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-02 21:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Message-ID | <mailman.341.1588448107.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> |
Am 02.05.20 um 21:31 schrieb Chuck Aurora: > On 2020-05-02 13:23, Erich Eckner wrote: >> Will there be client-side DoT/DoH support in bind, too? E.g. will my >> recursive (or forwarding) resolver be able to resolve upstream dns via > > Well, a recursive resolver cannot use DoT/DoH for iterative queries to > authoritative NS servers, unless authoritative servers offered DoT/DoH, > and I don't think that's likely to happen. > > Basically by deciding you want DoH/DoT upstream, you also have decided > that you want to use forwarders. says who? https://www.cira.ca/newsroom/canadian-shield/cira-launches-canadian-shield-provide-free-privacy-and-security-canadians
Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind
csiph-web