Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15700 > unrolled thread

Re: DoH plugin for BIND

Started byReindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
First post2020-05-02 09:28 +0200
Last post2020-05-02 09:28 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: DoH plugin for BIND Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-05-02 09:28 +0200

#15700 — Re: DoH plugin for BIND

FromReindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Date2020-05-02 09:28 +0200
SubjectRe: DoH plugin for BIND
Message-ID<mailman.323.1588404537.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Am 02.05.20 um 09:00 schrieb Michael De Roover:
> That's actually my biggest concern with DoH, ISP blocking. It doesn't
> seem as obvious as it is with DoT, but deep packet inspection (DPI) is
> already a thing. Don't expect an ISP that wants to block DoT to not
> (want to) block DoH either. The crux of the problem at that point is not
> the technology, it is the ISP's incentives. If the ISP wants to block
> DoT for whatever reason, personally I'd consider it.. not exactly fine
> but at least their right to do so. That's their decision to make. 

seriously?

that seems to be some US attitude, no wonder what happens there with
user attitudes like "but at least their right to do so"

the ISP by definition has exactly one right: get money for his service
which is described as "route and transfer every package, don't look at
it, don't mangle it, you have no business about the content of my traffic"

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind


csiph-web