Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #16066

Re: SRV is not CNAME, was srv lookup in record

Path csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: SRV is not CNAME, was srv lookup in record
Date 22 Aug 2020 13:58:06 -0400
Organization Taughannock Networks
Lines 16
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.823.1598119048.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <mailman.821.1598068790.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> <20200822175806.E0A7D1F05A2A@ary.qy>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1598119097 27523 149.20.1.60 (22 Aug 2020 17:58:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc dw@thedave.ca
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=f22b.5f415caf.k2008; bh=HNGDmq4BC7TjkwAQc3de3MOracc370eXN5NQspCRRRQ=; b=jIXtRupExUB4czfe3XLp7siC2RFhYJYkKqrUTbzYRD1zcjhYKMczoPJLkymwJHBdWN9kfRF/WAt28dKTJs3wIuW6gzKPMAUSB4uffFhvSFwJM//Yewnjpp/9BqELjyoi2eOvHW30Czq237ay7KzIu1LwvNDLM50a7S5Kw61tKl5F7IQRiEhz5D491XyOrsLS2yumdga5o8dUsIGKGskT5ZL3gRP892smr5sj1Tyb5Kkl9XSHxTbwAVJen9NKGigbNUuI79W/Jrs2kmmdrHSA9qJx5oU96SMvCGiq/+JJmv+0Kc4TspuXE+H19z3IkLQgJicHRgc4l4Il6y3M9Ual0g==
In-Reply-To <mailman.821.1598068790.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org>
X-Headerized yes
X-Spam-Status No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <20200822175806.E0A7D1F05A2A@ary.qy>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:16066

Show key headers only | View raw


In article <mailman.821.1598068790.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> you write:
>On 2020-08-21 16:26, Marc Roos wrote:
>> Is it possible to use srv lookups, like eg cname. I do not want to
>> create SRV record, I just want to 'get' the ip addresses, that I would
>> get vai srv lookup.
>
>SRV records are more than just pointers to a specific server, there is 
>also the priority and weight that need to be considered at the 
>application level.

More importantly, SRV records have port numbers.  In SIP, which seems to be
the largest current use of SRV, as often as not the port number is different
from the default 5060.

SRV really is not like CNAME.

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: srv lookup in record Dave Warren <dw@thedave.ca> - 2020-08-21 22:00 -0600
  Re: SRV is not CNAME, was srv lookup in record "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-08-22 13:58 -0400

csiph-web