Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: "John Levine" Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: SRV is not CNAME, was srv lookup in record Date: 22 Aug 2020 13:58:06 -0400 Organization: Taughannock Networks Lines: 16 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: <20200822175806.E0A7D1F05A2A@ary.qy> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1598119097 27523 149.20.1.60 (22 Aug 2020 17:58:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: dw@thedave.ca To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=f22b.5f415caf.k2008; bh=HNGDmq4BC7TjkwAQc3de3MOracc370eXN5NQspCRRRQ=; b=jIXtRupExUB4czfe3XLp7siC2RFhYJYkKqrUTbzYRD1zcjhYKMczoPJLkymwJHBdWN9kfRF/WAt28dKTJs3wIuW6gzKPMAUSB4uffFhvSFwJM//Yewnjpp/9BqELjyoi2eOvHW30Czq237ay7KzIu1LwvNDLM50a7S5Kw61tKl5F7IQRiEhz5D491XyOrsLS2yumdga5o8dUsIGKGskT5ZL3gRP892smr5sj1Tyb5Kkl9XSHxTbwAVJen9NKGigbNUuI79W/Jrs2kmmdrHSA9qJx5oU96SMvCGiq/+JJmv+0Kc4TspuXE+H19z3IkLQgJicHRgc4l4Il6y3M9Ual0g== In-Reply-To: X-Headerized: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200822175806.E0A7D1F05A2A@ary.qy> Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:16066 In article you write: >On 2020-08-21 16:26, Marc Roos wrote: >> Is it possible to use srv lookups, like eg cname. I do not want to >> create SRV record, I just want to 'get' the ip addresses, that I would >> get vai srv lookup. > >SRV records are more than just pointers to a specific server, there is >also the priority and weight that need to be considered at the >application level. More importantly, SRV records have port numbers. In SIP, which seems to be the largest current use of SRV, as often as not the port number is different from the default 5060. SRV really is not like CNAME.