Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #16030

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

From Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
Date 2020-07-23 11:06 +0200
Organization the lounge interactive design
Message-ID <mailman.778.1596190193.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References (10 earlier) <7caf7a134151405d805b295dc0c09a68@mail.rrcic.com> <5F15D831.4030707@ipinc.net> <1D095F7E-63E5-4AC0-B7F9-DA3A703DA29C@isc.org> <5F1911E1.9070908@ipinc.net> <67b9c985-92ea-2166-a8a8-b419e38e9aa5@thelounge.net>

Show all headers | View raw



Am 23.07.20 um 06:28 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
> But truthfully you are proving my point.  The simple fact is that bind
> will compile WITHOUT using a FreeBSD port.  Linux is 10 times worse
> because they aren't even including the c compiler or development tools
> anymore.  

that's nonsense and there is no reason to have them installed by
default, that's wat a package manger is for

> But many "systemadmins" out there think they are Unix admins
> yet are afraid to compile programs. 

and many real admins know that a compiler don#t belong to a production
system and is only needed on the buildserver building packages

if you type "make install" you aere doping it wrong

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-07-23 11:06 +0200

csiph-web