Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #16015

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:24 AM @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote:
>
> On 20 Jul 2020, at 11:45, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@ipinc.net> wrote:
> > When FreeBSD was used mostly for servers it wasn't a problem. But more
> > and more people are using it for desktop use where they want to basically install it and forget about it, never run patches, never give
> > a fig about security.
>
> Bind is a poor choice for desktop use. Packages like unbound are much better for that sort of use, and it is fr less critical if those packages have security issues.
>
      I was taught in kitty school "less critical if those packages
have security issues" is never a good argument. Just because
getting-into-a-desktop-and-then-using-it-as-launchpad-to-go-after-servers
is a traditional Windows attack vector does not mean Linux computers
are immune of that.

> I agree that anyone using a FreeBSD install as a server should be using bind, but I also agree it should not be the default install. You install bind when you figure out you need it, and not before.
>
>
>
> --
> Mickey and Mallory know the difference between right and wrong; the
>         just don't give a damn.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel@gmail.com> - 2020-07-23 06:30 -0400

csiph-web