Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15998
| From | "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? |
| Date | 2020-07-21 16:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.740.1595370198.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> <CAGrdBBsmX-7Q1=vNxJciuOQSsQgRaRMV=ZyxGdoYFQNj6kVcPQ@mail.gmail.com> <58657E19-432C-4817-8E94-557955BAC0B2@kreme.com> <7495C42E-F6F6-4E8B-B465-FCC100DAA86A@isc.org> <EE57DA95-A8F3-4A01-8E45-CF2F4593C5AB@kreme.com> |
On 21 Jul 2020, at 06:37, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: > On 21 Jul 2020, at 18:23, @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote: >> >> Bind is a poor choice for desktop use. Packages like unbound are much better for that sort of use, and it is fr less critical if those packages have security issues. > > Anything that talks to the net is critical path from a security perspective. There are different levels of critical, and unbound is a lot further down that list that bind. -- We are born naked, wet and hungry; then it's all downhill.
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> - 2020-07-21 16:23 -0600
csiph-web