Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15992
| From | Michael De Roover <isc@nixmagic.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? |
| Date | 2020-07-20 21:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.733.1595274830.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <7caf7a134151405d805b295dc0c09a68@mail.rrcic.com> <67933d46-6883-dfbd-8cfb-194de97f57df@ghnou.su> <5F15EB11.2080208@ipinc.net> <3a8503c8-b46c-2905-f2d9-a3f1d6670186@ghnou.su> |
Sorry about that, the email might've been a bit too emotionally loaded. The issues pile up.. and that's eventually the result. I'm not using FreeBSD anywhere anymore but found some resources online suggesting that the package name is bind916. The closest I could find to unwinded is Unbound which apparently is what replaced BIND in FreeBSD and OpenBSD. Is this the case? Generally speaking all I'd ask for is consistency. Currently that does not appear to be present anywhere. Everyone gives things their own (new) names even if they're supposed to describe the same thing. It's extremely confusing. On 7/20/20 9:05 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > On 7/20/2020 11:23 AM, Michael De Roover wrote: >> If that is true, I hereby lost all faith in humanity.. well whatever >> faith I had left. This has been going on for like half a decade now. >> > > Nobody ever went broke catering to the human desire for ease.... > _______________________________________________ > -- Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards, Michael De Roover
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Michael De Roover <isc@nixmagic.com> - 2020-07-20 21:53 +0200
csiph-web