Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15981

Re: [DoD Source -- ssshhhh Top Secret] Re: Dumb Question is an A or AAAA record required?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: [DoD Source -- ssshhhh Top Secret] Re: Dumb Question is an A or AAAA record required?
Date Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:24:18 +0200
Organization the lounge interactive design
Lines 35
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.717.1594899666.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <f53577847c73438cb8ec88636317b06b@mail.rrcic.com> <9309970d-4d8d-c6f8-f37b-297b5134eff7@thelounge.net> <ddae9ac4-1339-36b0-64de-f56bd7d214d6@nixmagic.com> <40fe75be-4666-4f1e-2833-5051f4f567ac@thelounge.net> <e7936e21-5a2c-440e-f634-5c0ba6e5c4d7@nixmagic.com> <c41c6b25-ac01-8c9a-9a32-d97c4118435b@thelounge.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1594899702 31475 149.20.1.60 (16 Jul 2020 11:41:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
In-Reply-To <e7936e21-5a2c-440e-f634-5c0ba6e5c4d7@nixmagic.com>
Content-Language en-US
X-Spam-Status No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:41:04 +0000
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <c41c6b25-ac01-8c9a-9a32-d97c4118435b@thelounge.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References <f53577847c73438cb8ec88636317b06b@mail.rrcic.com> <9309970d-4d8d-c6f8-f37b-297b5134eff7@thelounge.net> <ddae9ac4-1339-36b0-64de-f56bd7d214d6@nixmagic.com> <40fe75be-4666-4f1e-2833-5051f4f567ac@thelounge.net> <e7936e21-5a2c-440e-f634-5c0ba6e5c4d7@nixmagic.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15981

Show key headers only | View raw


Am 09.07.20 um 17:20 schrieb Michael De Roover:
> On 7/9/20 5:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> but it still has nothing to do with your domain by definition, the PTR
>> could be anything
> Of course it can be, they're completely separate name spaces. However
> would it make any sense in practice to point it somewhere else entirely?
> You'd probably be better off not setting it at all then. I'd argue that
> they're meant to match each other.
>> but how does that change anything in the simple fact that "Would the
>> lack of A records affect pointer records? Seems like it would" given
>> that the PTR zone is a dns zone like anything else
>> while it's smart (at least when you want to send mails) that your IP has
>> a sane PTR and that the name maps back to the IP the dns system couldn't
>> care less
> My thoughts exactly. They can technically be different and the DNS
> itself indeed couldn't care less (but applications checking for that
> might).. but would it make sense to? I mean yeah I suppose that they can
> exist without the other. Not uncommon for A records to be without PTR
> records, and I guess that a PTR record without an A record could work
> too..? But again, aside from the theoretical possibility, why would you
> want to set your PTR records to not match at least one of your A records?

they question was "Would the lack of A records affect pointer records?"
an dthe answer is clearly *no*

my first response was "while it's smart (at least when you want to send
mails) that your IP has a sane PTR and that the name maps back"

so it's not a matter of "would it make any sense in practice" and "why
would you want to" because nobody want's and that was not the question

case closed, period

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: [DoD Source -- ssshhhh Top Secret] Re: Dumb Question is an A or AAAA record required? Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-07-09 17:24 +0200

csiph-web