Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #97

Re: Using IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send queries to a DNS server

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: Using IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send queries to a DNS server
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:48:56 +1100
Lines 35
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.57.1320972556.68562.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <CA+ofH6_Bg4QDMe9oEH1kvoDba0dLyw44XH7m0=JRzGPQBED5Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ofH68z4wuagAbXsjnvFyHYHjLkKsyLJmuTRQYCgBPhMDvdOw@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1320972557 25932 149.20.64.75 (11 Nov 2011 00:49:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bind-users@isc.org
To Hansen Candrawinata <hansen.candrawinata@gmail.com>
Return-Path <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
In-reply-to Your message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:19:53 +1100." <CA+ofH68z4wuagAbXsjnvFyHYHjLkKsyLJmuTRQYCgBPhMDvdOw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.protocols.dns.bind:97

Show key headers only | View raw


In message <CA+ofH68z4wuagAbXsjnvFyHYHjLkKsyLJmuTRQYCgBPhMDvdOw@mail.gmail.com>,
 Hansen Candrawinata writes:
> Thanks for the responses.
> 
> Can a DNS server (the machine, not BIND) be a tunnel endpoint
> for 6to4?

Yes, provided it meets all the criteria for being a 6to4 tunnel end
point.  You need a non ambious IPv4 address for the tunnel end
point.  If your ISP gives you a NAT'd (shared) address you can't
run 6to4.  You can't use a RFC 1918 address for your tunnel end
point.  Your firewall needs to expect reply traffic from anywhere
from anywhere.  Just because you send your encapsulated packet to
192.88.99.1, don't expect the encapusulted reply traffic to come
from 192.88.99.1.  6to4 traffic is asymetric.  Some ISP run firewalls
which block non symetric traffic.

A major part of the problem Google and other big providers have
with deploying IPv6 is badly configured 6to4 gateways (often done
automatically) and code that doesn't fall back to IPv4, or fall
back to IPv4 in a timely manner.  Put the two together and you have
problems.

Test your 6to4 configuration.

Personally I would setup a tunnel with a tunnel broker, like HE.NET,
rather than running 6to4.  You then know who to talk to when you
have IPv6 problems.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Using IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send queries to a DNS server Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> - 2011-11-11 11:48 +1100

csiph-web