Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15844

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

From	Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject	Re: BIND Masters and slaves
Date	2020-06-15 15:17 -0400
Message-ID	<mailman.530.1592248629.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2006141824180.29360@pannier.local> <614285A0-CBD4-41AA-BD84-B0F0C3C24626@versatushpc.com.br> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2006151522390.22139@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHEKYV4U_ZeHq-0d_82xkeg9acDeDDxbR3bf8WAtV5jn3EhR8A@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:38 AM Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
>
> Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> >
> > But the prevalence of terms are still master and slave. And I really
> > hope this thing of changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to
> > political correctness.
>
> "Political correctness" just means being considerate for other people,
> especially people who do not have many of the advantages we might take for
> granted.
>

Being considerate to others should not be associated with politics,
something the term "political correctness" is.

There is a term in Africa for those who use "especially people who do
not have many of the advantages we might take for granted" in their
sentences; it is not a particularly positive term.

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: BIND Masters and slaves Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel@gmail.com> - 2020-06-15 15:17 -0400

csiph-web