Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15834

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

From Nis Wechselberg <enbewe@enbewe.de>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: BIND Masters and slaves
Date 2020-06-15 08:29 +0200
Message-ID <mailman.515.1592202581.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006141824180.29360@pannier.local> <614285A0-CBD4-41AA-BD84-B0F0C3C24626@versatushpc.com.br> <353729a6-5dee-c596-7f26-38eb960547f5@enbewe.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Totally not BIND related, but in BDSM "top" and "bottom" are quite
widely used. So there is a non-slavery-related nomenclature there as well.


Am 15.06.20 um 00:53 schrieb Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users:
> ISC had a statement about it a time
> ago: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/942815837299253248
> 
> You can now call primary and secondary zones. But the prevalence of
> terms are still master and slave. And I really hope this thing of
> changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to political correctness.
> 
> For the newcomers it’s not OK to break years of terms, software and
> documentation just because some people can’t handle terms like master
> and slave. Slavery still exists today and making the word disappear will
> not solve the issue.
> 
> And you’re correct about the BDSM thing. It’s a waste of time, efforts
> and lines of code.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>> On 14 Jun 2020, at 19:38, Brett Delmage <Brett@BrettDelmage.ca
>> <mailto:Brett@BrettDelmage.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> I just read
>> GitHub, Android, Python, Go: More Software Adopts Race-Neutral Terminology
>>
>> at
>> https://developers.slashdot.org/story/20/06/14/1722223/github-android-python-go-more-software-adopts-race-neutral-terminology
>>
>> The BIND 9.11 Administrator Reference Manual at
>> https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01493
>> still refers to masters and slaves.
>>
>> Is this ARM the most recent version?
>>
>> Are there any discussions about changing terms?
>>
>> Anyway, when one is talking abut BDSM^H^H^H^H BIND, "master" and
>> "slave" are the established terms, I believe?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>> unsubscribe from this list
>>
>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
>> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
>> information.
>>
>>
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> 

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: BIND Masters and slaves Nis Wechselberg <enbewe@enbewe.de> - 2020-06-15 08:29 +0200

csiph-web