Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15834
| From | Nis Wechselberg <enbewe@enbewe.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: BIND Masters and slaves |
| Date | 2020-06-15 08:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.515.1592202581.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006141824180.29360@pannier.local> <614285A0-CBD4-41AA-BD84-B0F0C3C24626@versatushpc.com.br> <353729a6-5dee-c596-7f26-38eb960547f5@enbewe.de> |
Totally not BIND related, but in BDSM "top" and "bottom" are quite widely used. So there is a non-slavery-related nomenclature there as well. Am 15.06.20 um 00:53 schrieb Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users: > ISC had a statement about it a time > ago: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/942815837299253248 > > You can now call primary and secondary zones. But the prevalence of > terms are still master and slave. And I really hope this thing of > changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to political correctness. > > For the newcomers it’s not OK to break years of terms, software and > documentation just because some people can’t handle terms like master > and slave. Slavery still exists today and making the word disappear will > not solve the issue. > > And you’re correct about the BDSM thing. It’s a waste of time, efforts > and lines of code. > > Regards, > >> On 14 Jun 2020, at 19:38, Brett Delmage <Brett@BrettDelmage.ca >> <mailto:Brett@BrettDelmage.ca>> wrote: >> >> I just read >> GitHub, Android, Python, Go: More Software Adopts Race-Neutral Terminology >> >> at >> https://developers.slashdot.org/story/20/06/14/1722223/github-android-python-go-more-software-adopts-race-neutral-terminology >> >> The BIND 9.11 Administrator Reference Manual at >> https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01493 >> still refers to masters and slaves. >> >> Is this ARM the most recent version? >> >> Are there any discussions about changing terms? >> >> Anyway, when one is talking abut BDSM^H^H^H^H BIND, "master" and >> "slave" are the established terms, I believe? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to >> unsubscribe from this list >> >> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support >> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more >> information. >> >> >> bind-users mailing list >> bind-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: BIND Masters and slaves Nis Wechselberg <enbewe@enbewe.de> - 2020-06-15 08:29 +0200
csiph-web